Rowena and Ketch?


I maybe in the minority here, but I am finding the chemistry between the pair fun, mischievous and creative to watch. Their charisma together is drifting into something that could last.

Thoughts... Yeah, or neigh ....





reply

i agree, they are good together but i like rowena in all her scenes.

reply

It was fun to watch her flirting with him as she did with Gabriel. When she first appeared I wasn't impressed with her character. When she tried to manipulate Crowley to make him into her idea of a King should be turned me off. But she is a total survivor, not meaning the spell that keeps her alive. It's was just the way she went about it I didn't like.

I like her now. Was glad they changed her character when she joined the J's and became part of their team. She's still feisty and now it's fun to watch her.

reply

Agreed.

reply

Ya, thay actually made me squirm a couple of times. Ketch was looking at her like a piece of meat, lol.

reply

I'm not surprised as buckleming cant write an episode without sexual tension and a whole bunch of random crap going on all at once, whether it makes sense or not. So, neigh.

I dont want Ketch to say to the boys on how he slept with their mom and Crowleys mom. I still dont like ketchup and think bringing him back/keeping him around was a bad idea and crappy writing.

reply

I think if I had a/the choice I would loved to have seen Mike Davies come back. The guy who was killed off. He really has some fan following on Twitter. I like Ketch(up) ha! but get your point poor writing. I love Buck on his own, I think she is the problem within the fandom. Always has been.

reply

Now, if Mick was kept around, that would make sense to me and I would prefer. Because he was already seeing the Wichesters side and we got that flashback of him where it looked like he didnt like the BMOL, but it was all he knew/had.

How about stop killing off friendly characters and stop making bad guys good guys, especially after doing so much damage.

It still irritates me a bit that Meg became a helpful hand. She murdered a lot of hunters, being portrayed by a different actress doesn't give the demon a clean slate.

Watching the fight scene between Dean and Ketch in season 12 was great, but now there's nothing there. Hes back and an ally and it's annoying.

Buckleming eps are always the same. Some type of sexual tension or unnecessary hookup and a shit load of characters and a bunch random crap to slow down a story. I dread whenever they have an ep to premiere.

reply

Do you remember on IMDb they used to call them the Nepotism Duo, now after all this time I can see why. You both have negative and positive points but when it comes to these two, you are totally negative? Occasionally, they do the odd good episode but its seldom. I think still its Eugene that writes that side of stuff.

I can't imagine Buck being that sort of writer. When you see him at Comic-Con being interviewed he appears very knowledgeable, with it, and almost super fan quality within him. He comes up and surprises me now and again. I would love to see him write an episode on his own, without her. Just to see if there is a distinct difference in his writing capabilities and confidence as a writer. Dabb came out on his own when Lofflin left so why can't he?





reply

My time on Supernatural's IMDb was soon before it's end of message boarding, but I didn't know all "names" or might not of even caught up with the show at that point. But I have heard of the "nepotism" due to Robert Singer's wife, right?

They've done a few OK, a few good, but lately I haven't like their episodes and they have the same formula, so I know what to expect.

I agree about Buckner in his interviews, he must be the one who keeps the episode slightly sane, somewhat of a balance. Eugene should've went to write for General Hospital.

reply

Nope. Both dead now....oh well ...

reply

ketch is now doing state farm commercials

reply

That explains why they wrote him out then. Shame, he's a good character. He was beginning to feel like a regular guest.

reply