I just watched it now! it wasnt as good as the first because so many actors got replaced and thats what messes up the movies when a different actor plays the part another person played in the original!i thought it was decent and I love josh brolin aka bad ass of the f* in weekend! rosario dawson was hot as f-ck!
shareI've seen this movie twice and I don't remember anything about it. Seriously.
shareThe car scene with her near the end… oh hell yeah!!! 😎 That aside… SHE ruined it? Please. This sequel was certainly a step down from the first, albeit Rosario was easily one of the highlights in it — and that’s despite having LESS screen time this time around. And although she had less to work with overall, she was no different here than she was in the first film — and she was great in the first.
On that note, of course this isn’t on the same level as Sin City 1. Again though, *Rosario* ruined it? As much of a disappointment as this film was considered, Rosario being THE reason it failed to capture the magic of the first film is fortunately not something many (if any) will agree with. Now, while I don’t feel it’s a total failure like many do, I’m not surprised it didn’t work anywhere near as well as the first one did. Apart from it being a sequel that arguably came a little too late, the recasts were distracting (Brolin was serviceable but Owen definitely owned that role) but above all the script was the film’s main problem.
With that said, comparisons to the first film notwithstanding, A Dame to Kill is still a damn good time to me. A flawed film, sure, but an eye-popping good time that isn’t without its merits. If for anything else, getting to see much more of Marv (all his segments worked for me) was cool.