Have to ask....


First, this is my favorite movie of all time and don't mean this as a critique. But I do have one question I can't answer myself.

The decision was made to alter course in order to potentially acquire the bomb on Icarus 1. I get the "two is better than one" argument and can totally buy it as a device to move the film where it needs to go. But why did they decide to rendezvous with the Icarus 1 on the way to the sun? Why not drop their own bomb and, if unsuccessful, retrieve Icarus 1 and try again?

It is mentioned Icarus 1 "almost made it," so I imagine reserves of fuel, food etc. wouldn't be an issue. Even if it were, if they knew the first bomb failed, then they're going home to nothing anyhow and they might as well go for the other bomb regardless of resources for a trip home.

In my mind, the return trip could easily deviate it's course so...why???

Much love.

reply

It was not stated explicitly as a reason, but the return trip could not just easily deviate its course. On the return trip, the Icarus 2 wouldn't have the big heat-shield-array, because it would have been released with the payload. Hence in order to stay protected from the sun, the return trajectory was designed such that Icarus 2 would be moving away while staying in the shadow of the released payload+shield (until the distance was large enough that the smaller heat-shield would suffice).

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
http://youtu.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

Thanks!

reply

You're welcome!

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
http://youtu.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply