An amazing, wonderful film.


First, it should be said that a movie that works in the songs of a group, and weaves them in to the plot of a movie, set in a particular era, is a particularly difficult thing to do. The same rules of movies don't apply.

If you think dialogue and situation is leading up to a particular song, and then that song occurs, that is to be expected. That is the point of the genre. It's not a case of "too obvious," IMO.

If you think the scenes don't flow as well as in a movie without specific music woven into it, you would be right. Because the scenes are made to work in the music, in addition to particular songs inserted because they fit.

So enough about the this unique type of movie. It's not like other movies. Any disjointed plot moves or trite dialogue are to be forgiven in this type of movie.

As for the acting and singing - suberb. Absolutely spot on. The casting was perfect, too. Each character looked the part. Their voices fit the songs they sang.

The sets and costumes were also spot on. It takes the viewer back to an era, in appearance and feeling.

The movie was a delightful experience from start to finish. If you love Beatles music, you will like this movie. The movie does the Beatles music justice and expands on the meaning of the songs. It's easy to lose the meaning of some of the songs, now, since we're in a later era, when the younger generation might not understand. The actors look as if they get the music, too, and they sing the songs spot on.

I absolutely recommend this movie to anyone who likes movies like this (movies written around one group or one artist's songs). And anyone who likes musicals. And anyone who likes good looking young men. And anyone who likes good movies. And anyone who likes the Beatles. And anyone who likes the era of the movie. Well done!

reply

Agreed. I couldn't have stated it more cogently. Well done.

Actors do not have a job...they have a blast!

reply

I agree ... and I wouldn't trade growing up in the 60's and 70's for anything .

"A man that wouldn't cheat for a poke don't want one bad enough".



reply


So enough about the this unique type of movie. It's not like other movies. Any disjointed plot moves or trite dialogue are to be forgiven in this type of movie.


Why? Why does a movie get to be disjointed and trite just because it's (a little) unique?

I mean, it's not exactly the only work of its type. There's Mama Mia, The Wall, We Will Rock You, there's even multiple episodes of Glee that weave one artist's music into a musical. Jukebox musicals have been on the go for decades and a lot of them have come out way less disjointed than this one. None that I've seen were less trite though, so I guess maybe we do have to forgive that... Sadly a genre often attempted but rarely well executed.

reply

And anyone who likes musicals.

---

I agree 100% - an amazing movie but right over the head of americans so it flopped.

I don't particularly love musicals but South Pacific [1958] was great, BUT had the luxury of having the music [espec Carefully Taught] tailor made FOR the movie.

Julie Taymor had to work WITH known music so that made her task that much harder.

"Doesn't anybody want to listen to my story" - what an amazing line to start from an amazing song.

http://www.kindleflippages.com/ablog/

reply