Yes, that's well stated, sgtpowers. Why would a "copycat" don an elaborate costume, attack in broad daylight on a relatively open, grassy lake-shore, then switch from gun to knife to commit his crime if he were indeed a copycat? People may offer further speculations, but I believe those will not stand up to Occam's razor*, i.e., the least amount of assumptions points to the Zodiac as the Lake Berryessa responsible. He was intensifying/expanding his M.O. This is common behavior for serial killers.**
The fact that Bryan Hartnell survived and related the events to law enforcement and the media did work in Zodiac's favor. Why would Zodiac need to follow up with the newspapers?
Furthermore, people often overlook the fact that just two weeks following the Lake Berryessa attack, the Zodiac carried out the Paul Stine cabbie murder (Oct.11, 1969), involving planning, preparation, and the mailing of a letter of responsibility immediately after committing the crime. Four weeks after that, Zodiac devised, completed, and sent the 340 cipher (Nov.8, 1969). No matter what anyone believes the cipher may or may not say – look at it – that thing wasn't put together overnight! If the zodiac worked at least part-time (probable), then he obviously had a lot more on his plate during these months—his most active period—than to concern himself with seeking redundant credit for Lake Berryessa.
NOTE: Members of one or more of the amateur community Zodiac research sites have identified the significance of the "candy cane"-style lowercase "f", 3-stroke "k", and low-cross "t" found on the VW Karmann Ghia car door and in canonical (acknowledged) Zodiac communications. [Specific observations made by community member, Bently, a.k.a., Wrench.]
Other researchers have also pointed out the parallel of the "by knife" from the car door and the hand-printed "By KNiFE" on the back of the Halloween card, which Zodiac mailed Oct.27, 1970 (exactly 13 months later).
* "Among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected."
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
**The MO is what the offender must do in order to commit the crime. For example, the killer must have a means to control his victims at the crime scene such as tying them up. Significantly, the MO is a learned behavior that is subject to change.
A serial killer will alter and refine his MO to accommodate new circumstances or to incorporate new skills and information. For example, instead of using rope to tie up a victim, the offender may learn that it is easier and more effective to bring handcuffs to the crime scene.
— Scott A. Bonn Ph.D.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wicked-deeds/201506/serial-killers-modus-operandi-signature-staging-posing
reply
share