Yes, given the political realities of the UK, the US and the rest of the bloody G-8, this film WAS a bit of a fairy tale...but who says that fairy tales don't have their place, especially when they treat real problems and possible solutions in a more straightforward and, IMHO, powerful way than the whole overblown LIVE-8-Concert hooplah did. Call it "The Finance Owl and the Emotionally Battered ExCon Pussycat", if you wish, but this cynical, somewhat policy-wonkish TV writer (who HATES most TV) saw this little teleflick in the company of a macho car mechanic and a born-again ex-hooker (three folks EASILY as improbable as the central couple in the film), and it gave us all an embarrassing case of smiling sniffles.
As far as the ending goes...read carefully now, since most of you didn't seem to WATCH that way...he calls her because her words have obviously not only strengthened the backbones of the Brit PM and Chancellor of the Exchequer (which we CLEARLY see in the closed session), but have helped affect SOME sort of G-8 agreement (yes, one unrevealed at the film's close...but who says you always have to spell out EVERYTHING?) that represents more than the US's lame, "let's put it all into AIDS funding" stance and may indeed ACTUALLY...HELP...FIGHT...GLOBAL...POVERTY. (D'oh!) If Curtis' script HAD been more specific, I can imagine how many of you would simply have pooh-poohed it as even MORE preachy and unrealistic.
And as for the central couple's ongoing relationship, or whether he gets his job back (or even WANTS it back), I think it's far more interesting that those issues were left open. Time for each of YOU to get creative and dream up the ending you want for the story. And while you're at it, get creative about ways to make your country make a REAL dent on the horrendous statistics the film gave us about global poverty.
Happy viewing and... don't spill your popcorn!
reply
share