Will the 2006 Royal Rumble be as predictable as the last five?
Despite the fact that the Royal Rumble match is put over as this 'anything can happen' environment, it's actually been VERY predictable in the last few years. While it certainly doesn't make the match unwatchable (far from it), it does take away from the anticipation a little. Consider:
2001 - It was pretty well known that Rock vs. Steve Austin was to be the WM main event. The only question was who'd win the Rumble and who'd beat Kurt Angle at No Way Out for the WWF title.
2002 - If you didn't know Triple H was winning it, I feel sorry for you.
2003 - The only way you could have doubted Brock Lesnar winning it was because he wasn't even in the match until after the broadcast began.
2004 - Many expected Chris Benoit to be given the WM push, but a few people (myself included) had doubts that they'd go through with it.
2005 - Pretty clear that either Batista or John Cena would win it.
So will the 2006 Rumble be as predictable? The one good thing I can see is that at this point it is still wide open. Presumably after Survivor Series there will be a short list of potentials, though.
My music - http://rateyourmusic.com/user_albums/album_list_id_is_61377_and_list_type_is_owned