as someone with photography experience, i can tell you right now that there is a simple explanation for all of the white "shadowy" streaks that appear across photographs like many of the spirit images shown (and which inspired those first photos in the film from the graduation). it's called a "light leak." especially if you're using an old or crappy camera, teeny tiny holes in the body, particularly where plastic parts join around the boxy frame, can let a certain amount of light in through that crack. as you may know, light = exposure, so anywhere there's a concentrated amount of light, there will be whiteness of some kind. notice how most of the spirits seem to come from the edge of the frame? i have plenty of pictures that look like this, especially when using the cheap plastic holga cameras, famed for the "artistic" quality of smeary light that can occur.
it's funny how in the movie they tried to explain some of the spirit photos via "double exposure," which certainly could explain why whole faces or bodies end up in the middle of the picture. but they don't mention light leaks! this isn't to say it affects my enjoyment of the film at all, because i'm not one of those morons who is obsessed with the factual accuracy of spooky movies. however, a little basic photographic knowledge does allow me to feel quite safe in my dismissal of any actual people who claim spirit photographs exist in "real" life, particularly those of the white streaky kind.
oh yeah, and as to the question of why they would thank them if they're fake, i believe if you use someone else's photo in a movie, they own it, and you really have to credit them. there's such a huge number and they were probably obtained from willing submissions to the national enquirer and such like the magazine in the movie, but still it's what you're supposed to do. i think the way the filmmakers phrased it, with such reverence, is either evidence of their own paranormal sympathies or meant simply to be respectful of those people who do believe.
reply
share