MovieChat Forums > Hell's Kitchen (2005) Discussion > Two least talented finalists in HK Histo...

Two least talented finalists in HK History!


Neither of them can cook their way out of a paper bag. Both have huge ego and attitude problems. They won't last long as Head Chef. Think I am done with this show. This show skewed to a female winner. Going back to all the tastings. Gordon would say to a woman "Oh god this is AWFUL, hideous!!! I give it a 3" When to a man, "Oh its not bad, eh, I give it a 2". So obviously fixed. So whoever wins, really has won nothing since it had to be handed to them.

reply

Um what?! I feel like most of the guys sucked this season. The only one I think should have advanced further was Andrew.

reply

Andrew showed dominance in leading on the blue team but then on the red team he mellowed out and was more of a follower. I think that was his downfall, he didn't go to the red team and continue his domineering attitude to lead. He no longer had Johnny and his pals on the blue team to encourage him to act like an obnoxious brat. He and Johnny had some nasty attitudes early on.
I agree most of the guys sucked this season but the past few seasons the guys have sucked at least in comparison to the females. This whole season has lacked real competition, none of them look like they could get so far if they were up against other seasons chefs. I have come to expect plants and know the show is edited to create drama where it isn't or pushed to drive drama where they want it. However, I would expect at least 5 or 6 actual chefs who conduct themselves like professionals vying for a career changing position (think Christina) but it seems the bottom of the culinary world is being scraped and the left overs are accepted to compete.






reply

This season easily had the worst crew of chefs in the show's history, both personality and skill wise.

"I said no camels, that's five camels, can't you count?"

reply