MovieChat Forums > Doctor Who (2006) Discussion > So Isaac Newton is now Indian

So Isaac Newton is now Indian


World has gone cockeyed, folks. πŸ™„

https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-wild-blue-yonder-casting-backlash/

reply


Oh no, not a social media backlash. How devastating. That'll definitely be representative of what the British public thinks.

reply

SKIN COLOR...WHAT DOES IT MATTER?

reply


You just don't understand. It's a family-friendly sci-fi show about an alien who travels around in a police box and fights a different monster every week. How dare they not be historically accurate about Sir Isaac Newton's skin tone in a comedy bit where he's made to look like a chump. Takes you right out of the episode...

... or something.

reply

Well said. Now try and get Emma Stone cast as Harriet Tubman on the show.

reply

It's a British show. They'd be more likely to do a William Wilberforce episode. And I don't know if Ms Stone can do a northern English accent.

reply

Important, because Harriet Tubman was from Northern England.

reply

No idea what you imagine yourself to be communicating to me there. But the reality is: it was nothing.

reply

You can judge a wise man by the color of skin .
Aerosmith lyrics

reply

It matters a shit-ton to black people (as they never shut up about it)

reply

WHITE PEOPLE'S SKIN COLOR DISCUSSION LEVEL IS EQUAL.

reply

No it isn't (and you know it)

White lives matter?
White history month?
White entertainment television?


You're so full of shit kowalski, you need a flush installing into your neck,

Fuck off troll

reply

ALL LIVES MATTER.

WHITE HISTORY HAS 11 MONTHS.

WHITE ENTERTAINMENT TELVISION...LIKE 90% OF TV FOR THE FIRST 50 YEARS?



YOU ARE RUDE...BE NICER.

reply

All lives matter and White pride have been deemed 'racist' thanks to self-hating types like yourself.

I know this...You know this.

White history has no celebrated periodical celebration...simply because it doesn't need to have any..it's responsible for everything that we take for granted,
Black history month, is something that blacks (and their enablers) created, as a compensatory 'celebration" of nonexistent black history (which in reality is all shit) they've invented nothing (other than additions to already groundbreaking inventions) which is why, they now try to go back beyond recorded history with all this 'we waz Kangz' shit...until they realise it chides against they're 'we were brought here as slaves (despite the fact blacks invented slavery. Sold they're own into it and still practice such to this very day)

Care to refute this, please feel free to cite the great historical black moments/inventions?

I know this...You know this.

TV for the first 50 years was (still) for everyone...in fact it was one of the few 'mediums' that blacks actually prospered in. Please feel free to give a link to a channel called 'white entertainment television?

I know this...You know this,

You're a complete waste of bandwidth and time kowalski (I'm surely not the first to point this out) Yet somehow, you think everyone else is somehow wring and you're just some misunderstood progressive.

Despite your post count, you bring nothing to MovieChat and (I'll also wager) life?

reply

MORE RUDENESS...WHICH IS ALL YOU BRING TO MOVIECHAT...KOWALSKI HOWEVER...CAN BE FOUND ON EVERY FORM OF THREAD ON THIS SITE ENJOYING MOVIE DISCUSSION.


YOU NEED TO BE BETTER.

reply

The thing that annoys me is the hypocrisy. I watched the Unleashed episode following The Giggle and found the lecture about the original incarnation of the Toymaker's costume being Chinese in style very OTT.

If we have to accept Sir Isaac Newton, one of the world's greatest ever scientists and English born and bred, being played by a non-white actor, why is a character wearing a costume belonging to a different nationality so wrong?

reply

Because the character was white, of course (he says sarcastically).

reply

I have to apologise in advance for the curry we're having tomorrow night.

reply

My thoughts exactly. Russell T Davies seems to just be on a piss take more than anything else. How difficult would it have been to cast a white actor?

And to those defending his choices, they would be triggered if a person of colour was cast with a white.

reply

I'M OK WITH IT.πŸ‘πŸΎ

reply


Have you started watching the show, Kowalski? It seems like something you and your daughter might get a kick out of. New episode with a new Doctor airs in a couple of hours. The perfect place to start if you haven't already been drawn into this world.

reply

I HAVE WATCHED A ALOT OF COVERAGE OF THE SHOW BY VARIOUS YOUTUBE CHANNELS I ENJOY...BUT HAVE ALWAYS FOUND THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF SHOT TO BE DAUNTING...I AM SERIOUSLY CONSIDERING IT THOUGH...I HAV ENJOYED MANY BBC SHOWS OVER THE YEARS.

reply


It's a show that sort of naturally reboots itself every few years whenever they change the lead actor, so -- my advice -- forget about the sixty years' worth of stuff and just jump on. It'll start fresh and introduce itself all over again. That's what it does.

If you end up really liking it, eventually you may find yourself going back to 2005 and doing the big trip through all of 'New Who'. But it's not required. It's not really the kind of show where you need to do that.

Y'know, you don't have to have seen every episode of every incarnation of Star Trek to appreciate a self-contained Star Trek story. It's a bit like that.

reply

In addition to what capuchin said, I would highly recommend starting with the β€˜New Who’ 2005 stuff. This was where I started with Alexi and she absolutely loves the show (currently we’re up to where Peter Capaldi is the Doctor, so she’s still got a little bit to go).

For me David Tennant was awesome and both Matt Smith and Christopher Eccleston were excellent.

Give it a try, I’m sure you and Ali will love it.

reply