until then his masculinity was not a driving force in the character at all. [...] but he was never what people like to think of as "typically male". If anything he was more like an immortal Godlike figure, which separated him from the Captain Kirks of the genre who would basically shag anything
Short answer: NOPE.
Long answer: that's one of the consequences of feminist/diversity propaganda. When you think about traits influenced by being born male, all you can think is about a guy shagging anything, and probably watching sports and being violent.
While those are male traits, those are just a small amount of all the ways biological sex influences brain. Males rarely display each and every trait associated with that gender, but they cluster around them. Doctor Who lacks the sexual drive, but in many other ways he's
very typically male. He's much more interested in investigating or engaging than in establishing relationships, he's almost exclusively interested in solving problems, he loves things more than people, he's incredibly fond of his gadgets (he's more attached to his sonic screwdriver than to his companions), he sets principles above relationships, he sees commitment to other people as a annoyance, he's strongly non-conformist and subverter, he's genuinely interested in science in technology... to name a few male traits.
The Doctor has always been a pacifist who refused to touch guns, which would have been described as "woke" if the brainless pejorative term had been invented by boring conservatives at the time
Woke are no pacifists.
What they want is to control the guns. Oldest story in the book. Both US and EU deep states are fully woke. In US they're promoting anti-gun laws. In EU they're creating a new EU army under the direct control of Brussels. The common pattern is not being anti-gun, it's being the ones
having the guns
reply
share