I think it would have made even less without "Miami Vice" in the title, but a different title/characters might have saved it from the negative press. Miami Vice was considered all style, no substance as a show (I've never seen it, just repeating what I've heard), and I think a lot of people never gave the 2006 movie a chance as a result. It's more interesting and certainly more experimental than, say, Collateral, which is more conventionally satisfying but, oddly, I find it has less depth. Miami Vice has vision in spades, even if the characters don't connect to average people on an emotional level. It's hard to deny all of the research and authenticity. Looking at the movie again ten years later, it was way, way ahead of its time aesthetically and it's clear it was influential, even if nobody admits being a fan of this particular film. The style informed a whole generation of filmmakers on how to use digital to create uniquely beautiful images that don't happen with celluloid. It was a complete, matured esthetic looking maybe for a better story.
reply
share