IMDb bias?

When I look at the user comments for this film (http://imdb.com/title/tt0428959/usercomments), I see one positive one and three negative ones. The positive one has the majority approval of a good dozen users, and is the thoughtful opinion of someone who has seen the film. The three negative ones only have two positive votes between them, showing that the majority of people agree with me in observing that they are nothing but right-wing rants by individuals who show no sign of having seen the film.

And yet it is one of these rants (with 2 out of 6 votes) that has been displayed for some time on the main IMDb page for this film.

The rant contains no information about the film whatsoever beyond the unsubstantiated accusation that it is not composed of facts. The rest of it is a libellous extended ad hominem attack on Prof Chomsky, whose name is furthermore misspelt.

If the review on the main page for the film is automatically chosen, I can see no explanation for this terrible review being there. The only answer is that an IMDb admin chose to put it there. I would like to urge IMDb not to indulge in such underhand political manœuvres.

COGITABIS EVM QVEM SERVVM TVVM VOCAS EX ISDEM SEMINIBVS ORTVM