"I can't believe some the responses to the original poster! I'm apalled (sic) that someone, Christian or not, could come and confess an issue, a struggle, a concern, or anything of that nature, and have someone calling themselves a Christian attack him for it. It breaks my heart..."
You might consider taking a reading comprehension course. If you'll re-read the post to which you're referring, there was NO confession of an issue, NO struggle shared, and NO concern mentioned, nor did I attack him for any of those things. I addressed his helping the devil's agenda, which is accusing the brethren, which, again, if you'll re-read his post, is what he did. If you can't see that, then you have a serious inability to recognize how the devil uses peoples' mouths to deceive.
Again, if you'll re-read his post, it should be plain that he was the one on the attack, mocking the movie, its author, and all who helped make the movie, and in the process, mocking the idea that God blesses those who trust and praise Him and by extension, all who enjoyed the movies, not just Flywheel, but all the movies made by Sherwood. This is not my bias or my perception; he SAID these things. He made his points clear. YOU perverted his clear words and agenda from a damning mockery of the movie to a poor down-trodden struggling believer trying to get help and being stomped on by a self-righteous, merciless, holier than thou Christian hypocrite. The error is yours, it's huge and that's why I recommend a reading comprehension course. One as verbal as you shouldn't be so clueless.
It wasn't until his follow-up note that he said, "I made it clear that I am struggling with my faith."
I'll be charitable. He's being disingenuous. He presented a harangue against everyone involved with all the Sherwood movies and mocks the precious encouragement to faith that is presented, and in the middle of it casually mentions that "I would say I fall under category B" which by his definition is someone "struggling *with* Christianity because of trials in their life." Notice that he didn't say "in," but "with." The difference is day and night. "In" means he's committed to the Lord; "with" means he's unsure/uncommitted. This is unbelief.
If you're contentious, which you are, then you're arguing with the clear distinction that I put with those words. "I'm struggling in my Christianity" vs. "I'm struggling with Christianity." But it's clear enough to anyone who *wants* to understand. Everyone understands commitment -- in tough times you won't endure the tests without it.
Do you not recall the two passages in Hebrews that say, "Without faith it is *impossible* to please God" and "He who comes to God *must* believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him"? Are you so deceived that you do not understand that his mockery and contempt for these precious things polarizes him against the tender-heartedness which is necessary to cooperate with those two scriptures and that by taking the stance he's taking he is cultivating more and worse trials? I'm sure you are (deceived) because if you understood the truth I just told you, you would never have attacked me. You would have seen this guy is digging his own grave with his mouth and attitude. God resists the proud and gives grace to the humble. This guy is in the dark because he's on the outside [in unbelief] mocking, instead of inside (in humility crying out for wisdom, understanding and grace). Jonah 2:8
You don't have the Scriptural understanding to recognize that his description of where he is, is a perverted explanation of the second and third types of ground Jesus referenced in the parable of the sower.
Let me say it straightforwardly. You can either believe Jesus or you can believe this guy. You heard this guy; now hear Jesus. Jesus described this situation in Matthew 13:20-22. Do you so identify with stony places and thorns that holding fast to the Word is foreign, as it is to this guy? Am I being unmerciful? This guy didn't ask for mercy. Mercy is given to those who ask for mercy. Did he show the people of Sherwood mercy? Neither did he ask for help. Neither did he ask for prayer. He didn't ask for anything. No. Re-read his letter. It wasn't the letter of one crying for help in the battle. It was the smug, pretentious, "I know better" disdain of unbelief ridiculing those who tell stories of God's grace and mercy shown to those who humble themselves before Him whom the Scriptures tell us to fear.
That passage in Matthew tells why people "struggle with Christianity," which is a skewed perspective, or if you prefer, deceptive words for unbelief. It's because they don't give their heart, time and attention to the Word of God, but are sidetracked by "cares of this life and the desire for other things." This *chokes* the Word (from accomplishing its work in their life) and, not having root in themselves, they don't bear fruit to maturity. EVERYBODY gets tried. Jesus said plainly that the man whose house doesn't fall is the one who DID what Jesus said to do. The one caught up in the struggle (on his way to collapse) is the one who was too distracted with everything (thus keeping the Word from doing its work in his heart) and when the trials come, because *they don't know how to handle them," i.e., the relevant and pertinent Scriptures *are not* hidden in their hearts, thus they "don't know" what to do and they get swept away by the wind, the rains and the floods. They, of course, have many and varied explanations for their unbelief, but, if you paid any attention to the fourth type of ground, then you saw that the key to success was nurturing the seed of the Word of God *until* maturity in a good heart. But don't miss the fact that it is the work of the Word of God to make the changes in our hearts that we need -- but we're the gatekeepers of our hearts. If the Word doesn't do the work in our hearts, the parable of the sower tells us why. Also, remember when His disciples asked Him to explain the parable, He said, "You don't understand this parable? Then how will you understand all the parables?" That's a clue. This is the foundational parable to *get*.
EVERY single person who criticized me simply has no working understanding of what I just explained in those last two paragraphs.
It should be clear: Devastating trials (just as tough for everyone that pass the tests as for those who fail them) are the result of thorns, thistles, stones, obstacles, rootlessness, which all mean the Word didn't produce in the heart of the one *claiming* to believe. At the end of the story of the wise and foolish men, Jesus said very plainly, "If you know these things, you are blessed *if you do them*." This isn't rocket science; it's just obedience.
It takes much meditation in the Word of God to be able to retain it and treasure it *in the midst of hard trials* (that we all go through) and the one who "loses" his faith simply didn't give his heart adequately to our heavenly treasure, which is Jesus -- the Word of God. Telling someone the truth of this isn't mean and ungracious; it's just the opposite. The same devil who torments is the same devil who makes the truth teller "the bad guy" for telling the truth.
Let me say again what this guy's comments made clear. Not his brokenness and gratitude for the Word of God and comfort of the Holy Ghost in the midst of trial, but his contempt, not only for a Christian movie that has blessed many thousands of believers, but "every" movie made by Sherwood. Pay attention. I'm not making this up. He said it plainly. In English. "Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks." Matt. 12:34, Luke 6:45. "Let every fact be established in the mouth of two or three witnesses. Matt. 16:16
Did you miss his remark at the first of his second letter, "I was really hoping to stir something up"? Are you thick, slow, dense and stupid? Those aren't the words of someone learning to hold God's Word dear to his heart in humility through the trials of life, looking for encouragement or help or support; they're the words of an antagonist.
Your perception of his clear message if completely void while your swallowing of his subterfuge is pedantic and ludicrous. Astute, you're not.
A number of you attacked me with judgment and harshness, and for what? For being judgmental and harsh. I'm sure you miss both the irony and the hypocrisy. However, if you'll read Romans 2 slowly and carefully (and maybe four or five times), you might get the clear message and understand from whence we get the expression "the pot calling the kettle black." Your attack of me condemns you... according to the Word of God.
Condemning and judging me for what you consider condemning and judging another is, by definition, hypocrisy.
What I did was obey Prov. 26:5.
I've had many months to consider, reflect and evaluate my response. If I had it to do over again, I'd do the same thing again, notwithstanding the hypocritical, poorly considered, and misguided outrage against me. If I were to change anything, I might simply go into a longer explanation as I have here. After all, I did indeed challenge the man to repent. He couldn't see his need to do so and was confused by my suggestion. Hard-hearted people never see their need to repent. "Behold the proud. His soul is not upright within him." Hab.2:4
The reality is, though, that the mockers and blasphemers aren't persuaded by the wisdom from above, regardless of how sound it is nor how clear and detailed the explanation. They're naysayers, held captive by the devil to do his will. ...and the mob that hoots and hollers (mocks and ridicules) is never led of God.
What I just gave you is better than a college education.
reply
share