Interesting how the annoying kid managed to get his camera through all that water without it being damaged, and at the same time managing to recording everything without changing the tape!
Matt Stone and Trey Parker would love this film.
Not to sound like i enjoyed this incredibly crap movie (HA! insult to cinema more like!) but there was one scene in it where it showed the kid putting the camera in a plastic bag to protect it. But not having to change the tape or battery is stupid, my camera battery runs out after an hour as does the tape.
sharejust because we dont see him change tape/battery doesnt mean he did. he also wouldnt have had it running the ENTIRE time, just when something was happening like lifting the old lady up or trying to blow up the stuff blocking the hole
shareTape? maybe I wasn't paying attention, (it was easy to drift off on that ocean of inane banter that continued from when they set sail and didn't let up after the capsizing)... but wouldn't it have been a whizz-bang digital camera, with hours and hours of disc space?
shareDigital video cameras can also have tapes in them besides the dvd discs or whatever. Anyway, the point is he ended up having about 100 frickin hours of footage by the end of the film.
shareYou must all be deaf and dumb, well done to the person who relised he had a bag, and to the people that relised he wasn't filming everything, but shortly after the ship was flipped over, the guy with the aussie acent asked the kid to tape their escape, he then mentioned how he had a spare tape AND battery. and to the einstein who said 100 hours of footage should proberbly have their head read - what a dumb ass thig to say
shareI have a DV camera but I can only record 30 mins onto a 512mb card.
share