MovieChat Forums > Junebug (2005) Discussion > What rotten people...

What rotten people...


I'm not saying that Madeleine was perfect, but both Peg and Johnny treated her like garbage, right from the start, with no reason to do so.

Perhaps Johnny had an excuse, as in the fact that he treated EVERYONE like garbage, but Peg? I don't get what her problem was.

If my mother or brother had treated my wife like Peg and Jonny did, I would have given them hell, and if my wife's family had treated me that way, my wife would have given them the same. Good lord!


Time wounds all heels.

reply

Gabe1972 wrote:

Perhaps Johnny had an excuse, as in the fact that he treated EVERYONE like garbage,
Nope, only his perfect older brother who had always succeeded and he had always failed, and his mother who kept pointing that out to him.
but Peg?
Be serious. Peg sees herself as the most important woman in George's life. That is not true; she is deluding herself.She might've felt that she could dominate a younger wife, but Madeleine is clearly replacing her, and she doesn't like it.
If my mother or brother had treated my wife like Peg and Jonny did, I would have given them hell,
I understand, but George survived his extraordinarily difficult mother by hiding his feelings and giving her what she wanted. His whole childhood was a matter of not fighting his mother. It was probably the best that he could do.
and if my wife's family had treated me that way, my wife would have given them the same.
Madeleine wants very badly to be accepted by George's family.

reply

That's Johnny's excuse. I was using his treating everyone like garbage as an example of the fact that something is underlying, causing him to treat everyone the way he does, hence, an excuse. I'm not saying it's right, but he has an excuse, nonetheless.


Time wounds all heels.

reply

Gabe1972 wrote:

That's Johnny's excuse.
It is not an excuse. It is an explanation.
I was using his treating everyone like Garbage
But that's not true. Johnny is a completely different person at work. It is only around his family that he is that way.

reply

Personally, I found Johnny's character to be the least believable in this otherwise very natural-feeling film. He acts in ways I might excuse or expect in a young teenager, but not an adult. Of course, this isn't the path the filmmakers wanted so he was simply (to me) an oddity of self-centered churlishness. Simply put, he seemed like a real dope, and not as a product of his mother's favoring George. I'm glad they included the scene of him at work, but I still couldn't believe he could be that clueless dealing with his family.

reply

Yup, Peg didn't like Madeline because she is a force pulling George away from his home and his roots. Madeline didn't make an effort to ingratiate herself to them either. One of the first things she says is that they made the trip only to meet that artist. Then she called Peg "Pat", and made little effort to fit in or humble herself a bit. However I don't think Madeline is very perceptive about people in general. She gets so much wrong - from breaking that ceramic bird and not catching onto Ashley's attempts to help her save face to the awkward physical miss-messaging with Johnny. Kind of ironic for a person who is tasked with finding artists with highly individualized styles.

Madeline may well want to be accepted into George's family but unlike Ashley who oozes with natural charm, she seriously lacks adaptive social skills. The only social skill she seems to have mastered is her sexuality. She and George married after a week, and are very sexual but don't seem to connect on many other levels.

🐾

reply

ABBAcat wrote:

Peg didn't like Madeline because she is a force pulling George away from his home and his roots.
Peg would not like any woman who might be more important to George than she is.George had left his roots behind long before he met Madeleine. He has not been home in 3 years. He is probably not going to come home again except for a funeral, if then.
Madeline didn't make an effort to ingratiate herself to them either.
That is flatly untrue. Madeleine goes out of her way to be accepted by George's family.
One of the first things she says is that they made the trip only to meet that artist.
That is a ludicrous distortion.
Madeleine: And I insisted to George... I said if we're this near anyway, let's come here.
It was Madeleine who wanted to visit George's family. George did not want to.
However I don't think Madeline is very perceptive about people in general.
I don't agree at all. Peg and Johnny are very hostile to her from the beginning. Why Peg is, or should be, obvious. Johnny has hated his perfect brother since they were children. George always succeeded and Johnny always failed. And I believe Madeleine reminded Johnny of it frequently.Look at Johnny's face when George is singing at the church supper. Pure hatred.Johnny cannot afford a home for his wife and himself. And here is his successful older brother with his very elegant wife. It emphasizes to Johnny just how unsuccessful he has been.And that is enough of this nonsense.

reply

Are you trolling? I only ask because I think I am being baited to respond to words like "ludicrous" and "nonsense". I am not interested.

And that is enough of this incivility.

reply

ABBAcat wrote:

Are you trolling?
No. Your post was factually inaccurate and a gross distortion of the situation. Try reading what I wrote aboveTry reading what I wrote above. Almost nothing that you wrote has anything to do with the film. You are trying to impose a pattern on it that isn't there.If you want to, respond to the specific points that I made.

reply

No thanks, I really enjoy this film the way I view it. I read your comments, agree with some not with others. So it is interesting to read your comments, apart from the judge-y insults of mine. I think this film invites subjective interpretations, and resonates differently with different viewers, or even with different viewings. You will probably disagree with that and argue that there is only one set of fixed messages here. I can't agree. One thing that makes an older film rewatchable is its ability to not be static and to continually invite viewers to see it from different perspectives. I can watch this and be completely sympathetic to Madeline one time, then the next time I can see things that make Madeline into the antagonist. That's been my experience with this film.


🐾

reply

ABBAcat wrote:

You will probably disagree with that and argue that there is only one set of fixed messages here.
There is not one right interpretation of a work of fiction, but there's can certainly be ridiculously wrong interpretations.
then the next time I can see things that make Madeline into the antagonist.
Well, if you're going to post that, you may well find that someone says you are being ridiculous.
Yup, Peg didn't like Madeline because she is a force pulling George away from his home and his roots.
That is nonsense. You cannot support that from the dialogue. George had not been home in 2 1/2 years when he met Madeleine, and it is obvious that he does not want to be home now.
Madeline didn't make an effort to ingratiate herself to them either.
Madeleine wants to be accepted by George's family and she works at. She succeeds with Eugene and Ashley. Johnny is overtly hostile from the first time they meet. Peg is also but it is less obvious.
One of the first things she says is that they made the trip only to meet that artist.
She says that she was the one who wanted to stop by and meet his family. George didn't. But you see that as an insult?
Then she called Peg "Pat",
We see her having trouble with the names in the car. That is the easy mistake to make. No one sane would be offended by it.
and made little effort to fit in or humble herself a bit.
She made every effort to fit in, and she never acted superior or looked down on them. She actually does not feel superior to them any more than she does with her outsider artists.
However I don't think Madeline is very perceptive about people in general. She gets so much wrong - from breaking that ceramic bird
So, in your view a physical accident in an unfamiliar house is an indication that she is unperceptive about people. Do you object to my calling that ridiculous?
and not catching onto Ashley's attempts to help her save face to the awkward physical miss-messaging with Johnny.
Madeleine had no need to save face. She is a very empathetic person and she comforts people physically. Johnny is being a jerk.
Kind of ironic for a person who is tasked with finding artists with highly individualized styles.
That is actually good evidence that you are wrong. She gets along with and does not judge some very strange people. Madeleine talks to Wark while she is going to the bathroom. There is no door on the bathroom. She is unfazed by all of this.
Madeline may well want to be accepted into George's family
Madeleine is never going to be anywhere near George's family again except maybe for a funeral.
but unlike Ashley who oozes with natural charm,
LOL You call that natural charm? I would call it childish naïveté. I agree that it is charming in small doses.
she seriously lacks adaptive social skills.
Sure. That is why she is able to get along with the outsider artists that she deals with.
The only social skill she seems to have mastered is her sexuality. She and George married after a week, and are very sexual
I think I'm coming to understand why you dislike Madeleine so much.
but don't seem to connect on many other levels.
You are making that up because it is what you want to believe.If you are going to have people treat your posts with respect, you have to get at least some things right.

reply

Ok, I see your point. Madeline is perfect, and George's family are mean and awful in-laws. A daughter-in-law disliked by her husband's family. Of course, I see how that is such a clever and original story now. I do appreciate the time you took to copy/paste, quote and correct all of my ridiculous comments.

🐾

reply

ABBAcat wrote:

Madeline is perfect,
Madeleine grew up in a variety of cultures, and she understands about cultural differences. Now she deals with outsider artists, some of whom are quite strange. Madeleine is not at all judgmental about different cultures even in extreme cases.
and George's family are mean and awful in-laws.
No, only two of the four of them. Madeleine gets along extremely well with both Ashley and Eugene.
A daughter-in-law disliked by her husband's family.
A daughter-in-law disliked by her mother-in-law for what I think are obvious reasons. That is commonplace when you have a mother like Peg.
Of course, I see how that is such a clever and original story now.
The family dynamics that the story deals with are classic and rather easy to understand. When ida96 posted
I got a big whiff of Cain and Abel in the scene in which Johnny suddenly hits George on the head with a wrench,
she showed that she understands what is going on in this movie. You have not given any indication that you do.

reply

While I agree almost 100% with your analysis of this film, you could be a little more tactful with your disagreements.
People seem to forget this is a movie, albeit naturalistic, and there is tension meant to be created that we might find puzzling. I think Mad does her best to be friendly to her new in-laws, but she has a cultured veneer that some might find off-putting, and there isn't much she can do about it. The minute Mad stepped into the kitchen for a late night tutoring session I knew it wouldn't end well, and she should have been aware of how she might come across, but she seems to think everyone shares her relaxed "European" sensibility.
I also don't find Peg to be as awful as a lot of people are making her out to be. It's unfortunate the affect she may have on her loved ones, but she's just a rural matriarch who's rigid in her mindset. Eugene is no pistol; life may have disappointed her, too.
But I really like this movie. Another favorite with difficult family issues is The Sweet Hereafter. Solemn but moving.

reply

I hate to agree with ppllkk too much, but I do find your take on Mad to be odd. I think she tries to ingratiate and feel comfortable with her in-laws but they just don't feel comfortable with her. You seem very harsh toward Mad when that bird gets broken. She wants to own up to it but Ashley asserts herself, and Mad isn't sure how to proceed. At worst, if she's not perceptive it's because she doesn't expect her in-laws to be so standoff-ish. And I wouldn't at all say she seriously lacks adaptive social skills. She's up against some hard cases, it's not her fault they are so rigid.
While sex was an obvious element of the film, I don't read anything negative about their behavior or their connection with one another. Perhaps they don't "know each other" very well, but I don't see it as a significant plot point. Something to think about, though, maybe.

reply

I love this movie and I love discussing it.
For the most part, this movie has a very natural feel, and to me, the most believable character was the least likable - Johnny.
With his crummy little mustache, his sullen attitude, his general know-nothingness, he seems like a real person.
George and Mad are very handsome together, Peg the Mom (who's great in the role, btw) I'd seen in other work, Ashley is obviously a "type," adorable but not realistic. Dad's pretty cool in his quiet way, but Johnny looks the kind of guy you'd run into in any Wal-Mart. I love Ashley and I don't like Johnny, but he's believable, like a real person.

reply

Everyone in this movie is either a dimwitted moron or a sociopathic narcissist.

reply