Yes, it is strange as so much in this film is, which I liked - tends to be very contrived in parts. But it's not so much a question of why she was using a camera like this, but more of what she did with it. In the past, with an old-style camera, I automatically rolled on the film after having taken a photo and it was the same if it was the last picture on the roll. In that case I changed the roll immediately. Then everything was always ready for the next picture and in this part of Scotland (actually filmed in Wales) it's not unusual to be confronted with a huge basking shark or something similar when out on the sea. So why wait to roll on the film in the camera? But as the film had been removed she would have discovered the missing film immediately and for Patrick to find an excuse in the situation would have been almost impossible. So really this would never have happened in reality, as it was just too dangerous and not absolutely necessary at this point of time anyway. But then there's much more in this film which can't be explained and just has to be accepted unless you want to spoil the story.
reply
share