It may or may not be an odd question, when one considers the raw sexual content of the film, but was the fellatio scene trimmed at all? Edited in the respect so that it shortens the entire scene? One moment he's being sucked off and the next second, he ejaculates. It was rather quick. Also, why didn't she pull back his fore skin when she performed the act? That was also a bit odd I thought. Lastly. Why didn't she allow him to come in her mouth? There was an awful mess to clean up. Thoughts on this?
I imagine they shot the blow job scene and then shot the ejaculation separately, then cut them together. It wouldn't have been done live with two cameras cutting from one to the next. It would have been important for O'Brien to be aroused but stop himself from orgasming during the blow job. Then they would have set up the ejaculation scene by filming Stilley tossing him off until he came.
As for the foreskin, when I'm erect, my foreskin automatically retracts. I don't have to pull it back, and I'm only about six inches. O'Brien is about nine or ten inches, and when he's erect his foreskin still covers the head of his penis. So not only has that man got a very large dick, he also has one hell of a foreskin. Maybe he has trouble retracting his foreskin? It's not clear during the full blow job that leads towards the ejaculation whether Stilley has pulled the foreskin down or not. Stilley probably didn't know what to do with a foreskin, she's an American girl, and from what I gather the vast majority of American men don't have one.
As for the CIM, maybe they thought that was one step too far towards proper porn rather than the serious, thoughtful, art-film sex they would like you to believe this film is?
reply
share