MovieChat Forums > 88 Minutes (2008) Discussion > if too many F bombs gets you an automati...

if too many F bombs gets you an automatic R (spoilers)


spoilers spoilers






look im the last person in the world who thinks movies should have age based ratings or any other classification that tries to tell people what they can see or not see. i think it is just dumb.

nor am i opposed to sex, violence, profanity, drug use, when it is part of the plot. if your movie is called the texas chainsaw massacre, i can expect to see a chainsaw hacking into somebody right? fair enough. if i dont want to watch it i wont. i go see die hard, i can expect a few people to die hard. even when hannibal lector cut the top off the guys head, there was a method to the madness (although it was still, imho, torture)

but i for one am SICK AND TIRED of GRAPHIC POINTLESS TORTURE scenes in virtually EVERY R RATED THRILLER these days!

so if saying the F word too many times gets you an automatic R (which is the dumbest thing i have ever heard of), then if the MPAA is to maintain any credibility (which of course they cannot) any graphic torture scenes should give a movie an automatic T for TORTURE. sure the box says "disturbing violent content". this is a whitewash of the truth (can anyone say 'friendly fire') and not very specific. what some find 'disturbing' may not qualify for others. ive seen that same description on other movies that had no torture.

this movie is a perfect example. i was expecting an al pachino thriller, and not 5 minutes in there are roped up women getting sliced and diced. great. just great. so what am i to do, turn it off? keep watching and hope this is the last of it? to hell with this movie i have had enough. i returned it and got my money back from the rental place.

what is torture? certainly this could be debated. but i think at the point where someone is drugged, strung upsidedown by a rope, and cut with a knife in a way that will clearly not immediately cause death, the line has been crossed. that is torture. its beyond 'disturbing violent content'.

so in short, im not trying to ban anything. i just want to know if i am going to have to watch torture in the movie before i start watching it. let each person make their own choice. in particular let those of us who are sick of torture not have to watch it. there are plenty of outright torture flicks out these days without leaking it into other movies without warning.

"in this world there's two kinds of people ... those with loaded guns, and those who dig."

reply

Haha, better keep with the PG's then...



Gosiute Indians!!!? No wait, don't!

reply

Then you should enjoy this movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1029167/

Disaster Movie: From the guys who've seen way too many trailers

reply

well i certainly wouldnt complain if there was some torture lol.

"in this world there's two kinds of people ... those with loaded guns, and those who dig."

reply

Then you should enjoy this movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1029167


LoL. I was going to mention that the OP shouldn't go see Hostel (you can't really tell what this movie is about just from the title and no it's not like Eurotrip).

reply

pg-13 is allowed either one F bomb, or pr.i.ck, and of course as many sh!ts as you likes...

It's mercy, compassion and forgiveness I lack. Not rationality...

reply

i really didn't think it was all that graphic....it showed like, 2 seconds of the guy cutting a line on her leg, which isn't much

what would have been an "acceptable" amount to show the killer was a sadistic person, in you're opinion?

reply

its not how long it lasted. its that it had to go there at all. the guy in silence of the lambs was sadistic. we didnt see him actually skinning the women. i could give 1000 examples of movies that got the same point across without being graphic. its the recent trend of showing it explicitly that i find disturbing.

and like i said. im not saying they should ban the movie or anything... there are lots of things in movies that dont bother me but im sure bother other people as much as graphic torture scenes bother me.

i just think they should make it clear that a movie shows torture and not just lumping it in under 'disturbing violent content'

"in this world there's two kinds of people ... those with loaded guns, and those who dig."

reply

[deleted]