Damages
Ok, I'm aware that this is based on a true story.
I am also aware that it happened in the 1980's so things may have been a bit different back then.
I am also aware that this is a movie so not everything have have been quite the same in real life...
however...
it seems to me that if what the movie showed represented even close to what was actually happening in real life that this would have been a prime candidate for massive punitive/exemplary damages.
But the blurb at the end of the movie said the damages awarded were modest!
It seemed that the action was heard by a judge sitting without a jury - this may have been a factor.
Can anyone tell me why the damages were so modest?