ca-turtle...
Your point about publicity is an interesting one. I'd like to augment it a bit and take a different tack. Now, despite how we might feel about the hype surrounding a movie, or in cases such as this, the lack of it, it does seem to have an important effect on what we get from it. Naturally, if the movie is over-hyped or if there is nothing worth watching over and above what was hyped, we are not going to get a good impression of the movie itself. But, if the publicity associated with the movie appropriately teases us and the movie lives up to it, we can have an enjoyable experience.
But there is also another effect of publicity. I'm reminded of watching a sporting event on TV. We often critique those who bring it to us and provide "color", and wish they would get out of the way so that we could enjoy it better. As it turns out, though, and I think the TV folks recognize this, our harping at these folks, or even when we don't recognize the significant contribution to what we get from watching it, these features play an important part of the entertainment we get from watching. True, some may actually prefer to have none of the pseudo-excitement being generated by these commentators, but for most, watching a sporting event on TV without any comments at all is a very boring thing.
My point here is that while at least part of what we get from watching a movie depends on what we expect going in and this can be generated by pre-release publicity, there is also a part derived from how others have colored and presented it. I suspect most of us derive a significant portion of our enjoyment from having shared experiences.
(On re-reading this, I'm not sure I've made clear the distinction I wanted to make. But, since it is already too long a post, I won't spend more time on it to make it clearer. My apologies.)
James
reply
share