What happens in the future is not going to be a result of just one person winning the election. In a democratic system, the "future" has already happened. Who wins the election is more of a result rather than the cause.
Human beings of the world have been de-evolving and technology will be the new civilization.
It's just the natural order.
The future of mankind is nothing like this movie.
"In a democratic system, the "future" has already happened."
Excuse me? Could you please elaborate? Are you saying Democracy is a time machine?
What's so natural about elections and voting anyway?
"Human beings of the world have been de-evolving and technology will be the new civilization."
That's a bold claim - I also think it's 'devolving'. How do you mean, physically, mentally, spiritually or psychologically? There is all kinds of 'evolution' going on, some in actual reality, some in people's heads as theories. Human beings never 'evolved from apes', for example. That evidence does not exist - it's a logical and very charming theory, but it's just not bourne out by the facts.
Animals can't evolve into other specieses. Macroevolution is a lie (and just a theory, which people forget), microevolution is the only thing that happens. Fins can become more efficient, fingers can become longer, and so on. But you don't jump from fish to bipedal entity by 'evolution'. Also, IF evolution really happened the way Darwin postulated (based on very flimsy 'evidence'), why are the apes still there? Shouldn't they have evolved into humans by now?
Also, technology can't be civilization, only souls can create a civilization (though the word 'civil' really shies away from souls anyway, and towards 'artificial persons', so maybe you are right after all).
"It's just the natural order."
What's so natural about:
- voting
- elections
- presidents
- technology
I have never seen a laptop bush while walking in the nature.
Never bumped into a swamp of coffee makers. Haven't so far stumbled upon a forest of iphones.
Your post is just one big contradiction, there's nothing natural about any of those things, and who creates this 'order' you are talking about? Where do you get this kind of silly opinion?
The future of 'mankind' (whatever you mean by that, if 'technology' can be a 'civilization' in your opinion) is yet to be seen, and yet you seem confident that you KNOW it.
I mean, are you a PSYCHIC that can see into the future? Wouldn't seeing into the future immediately CHANGE the future, because now you're bringing information/knowledge about the future into the past (which is our present)?
Your post MAKES NO SENSE!