I saw the trailer for Zoom, and I have to ask this: why do both of the boy characters have such lame-o superpowers? The teenage girl has telekinesis. That's always good. The little girl has super strength. Also good. But what's with the 2 boys' "super" powers? Out of all the cool superpowers they had to choose from, are you telling me that the best thing they could come up with for the teenage boy was invisiblity? No enhanced ablities. No flying. No energy throwing. Just "You can't see me." Yeah, that'll bring down a guided missle. And then there's Spencer Breslin's character. What exactly is his power? Blowing up like a balloon? Why no energy powers, flying, shapeshifting or super speed? Zoom is potentially a good idea for a film, but the boys' lack of decent superpowers could be a weakness in what's otherwise an OK concept.
Of course, the kids didn't all have to be caucasian either, but that's another rant.
I don't consider the blowing up of body parts (like a baloon) to be a rip-off of Reed's stretching powers.
The guy who can turn invisible also has that "mind-sight" power, which Sue doesn't have. He doesn't have her forcefields either, so I don't consider him to be a rip-off of the Invisible Woman.
<quote>Now, here's what I don't get: you're willing to be sexist (what, boys have to have strong active powers, but girls have to have weak passive powers?), but God forbid you come off as racist. Of *course* they are all white - to the best of my understanding, they're siblings, right? Personally, I'm sick of everyone being so afraid of stepping on toes that the PC crap has gone extreme. But, hey, you're entitled to your opinion, sexist as it is. If you don't like the movie (even though you haven't seen more than the trailer), don't go see it. Or go see it, whatever, you're only punishing yourself by going to see something you've already decided you won't like, which is, to be blunt, stupid.</quote>
Kiss your parents at the bus stop, 'cause I'm taking you to school.
1) I NEVER ONCE said, or even implied, that girls had to have weak, passive powers. Don't put words in my mouth. Ideally, NO ONE should have weak, passive powers. I wasn't putting boys over girls in any way, shape or fashion. If that's how you chose to interpret my statement, than that's your problem, not mine. Why don't you read my entire post before jumping to conclusions when you don't even know me or even understand what it is that I'm saying? You'd look a lot less foolish that way.
2) FYI, you only said that the kids in "Zoom" MIGHT be siblings. If they are, then it's only logical that they all belong to the same race. That should be obvious to anyone who isn't a retard. And even if they ARE siblings, they still didn't have to be white. They could have just as easily been black siblings, or Asian siblings, or whatever. Quite frankly, I fail to see how wanting to see some different colors in theatres once in a while makes me a racist. Do you even know what that word means? I'm NOT anti-white. I'm just pro-other races. The point I was trying to make was this; Where is it carved in stone that all super/magic/fantasy characters have to be white? Show me what plaque that's enscribed on and I'll recind my statement. If you knew me, then you would know that I'm the exact opposite of a racist. Accusing me of being one because of this one post is ignorant and absurd to the point of being laughable.
3) You can call me all the mindless names that you want, but I still say that invisibilty is a weak superpower. If he has other powers, then that's a little better, but invisibility by itself is very limited. Even Stan Lee and Jack Kirby came to this realization with Sue Richards of the Fantastic Four. That's why he later decided to give her the power to manipulate force field energy.
You want a drink to wash the taste of foot out of your mouth?
OK. First off, let me just say that I am Jason's brother (hence the same last name); I am NOT just him responding to his own post. That said:
<quote>Okay, see this is one more example of what is truly wrong with the cinema these days: the audience. You people have no imagination whatsoever.</quote>
Statements like "You people" are VERY condescending and should be avoided whenever possible. And the last time I checked, it's the AUDIENCE who pays their hard-earned money to go see the movies that these wannabe-auteurs try to shove down our throats and then expect us to make them richer by purchasing all the merchandise and product tie-ins. It's the audience's business that keeps the movie business going, so you'd do well to not diminish their opinions/input.
<quote>"Oh, boo hoo, the boy has invisibility for a power, he can't do anything." Well, let's think about that now. He can escape detection and sneak into virtually anyplace he wants to gain valuable information. Being invisible allows him an incredible advantage in a fist fight, since it's pretty damn hard to hit what you can't see, and makes it very easy to blindside someone. And considering you've seen nothing more than the trailer, how exactly do you "know" he has no other powers? Maybe he's like Shadowcat and can phase. Or maybe he can fly. Maybe, like Invisible Woman, he can project force bolts (though that's unlikely, if the girl has TK powers).</quote>
IF he does indeed have other powers besides just invisibility, then that is infinitely better. But this is all speculation; in all likelyhood he doesn't, given that the other kids all possess only one superpower each. And sure, not being able to seen may give someone an advantage in a fight, if their opponent is an average person, but suppose the other guy is a Feral, who can track people by scent, or a Psionic whith extra-sensory perception, or a cyborg or android, who has the ability to see in infrared? ANY scenario such as those, and Invisible Boy immediately loses his major advantage. By your own argument, you've just proven Jason's opinion correct: that invisibility alone is of very limited use overall. Sue Richards was just the Fantastic Four's tagalong gal pal before Stan Lee and Jack Kirby decided to expand on her powers by adding the force field generation. She sure didn't become one of the most formidable women in the Marvel universe and co-leader of the F4 by just not being seen!
<quote>As for Spencer Breslin, he has the power of elongation/plasticity. In other words: he is essentially incapable of being physically harmed. Bullets, knives, basically anything short of a missile would simply stretch his skin rather than puncture it. Not to mention the whole kinetic attack thing. Ever seen a Super Ball bounce? Now imagine that super ball, but about 50 times its size, ramming into someone. That's a hell of a lot of kinetic energy hitting you, and if you think you'll survive a hit like that without ending up with a tube up your nose, you really don't know what reality is.</quote>
You can try to justify it all you want, but the harsh reality is that VERY FEW people are loking at Spencer's power and saying, "Wow, that's really cool!" In truth, 9 out of 10 of them are just laughing at it. After all it's hard not to laugh at the notion of a fat kid whose superpower is blowing up like a balloon, regardless of how effective it is in battle. For all outward appearances, it just appears to be comic relief.
<quote>Now, here's what I don't get: you're willing to be sexist (what, boys have to have strong active powers, but girls have to have weak passive powers?), but God forbid you come off as racist.</quote>
OK, I've read Jason's post about 3 or 4 times now, and I still have yet to see where he said or even implied that boys have to have strong active powers but girls have to have weak passive powers. It looks to me like you just jumped to that conclusion all by yourself or are just reading things which aren't there. If you will recall, his opening statement was that the girls both had DECENT powers, and that he felt that was cool. (I agree with this, although in the case of the younger girl, I personally wouldn't want just strength alone, but that's beside the point.) As was stated previously, ideally EVERY TEAM MEMBER should possess strong, active powers, regardless of a character's gender. If the GIRLS had cheesy powers, I'm sure he'd find that objectionable. Based on what I'm seeing, you just went off on a sexism tirade for no reason, 'cause he never once said that. And wanting to see more than just white actors getting a wide variety of roles including sci-fi/fantasy ISN'T racist, nor is it enforced Political Correctness. Why is it so wrong to want to see some non-white superheroes once in a while? Would it really have hurt the story of the movie if some or all of the kids had been non-white? I don't think so. So what I don't get is why you're getting so p***ed off over nothing and being so closed-minded to new ideas and concepts.
Wow you guys have very strong opinions about things that are not real lol...oh and who cares what there powers are it looks sorta like a good movie thats really all you need to know..oh and for the person who asked why they all have to be white or why all super heroes are white (or something along those lines) the reason is because most movies about super hereos were already written in a comic,or some type of book. therfore they were written to be white, so its not really the fault of the movie director its the comic book writer...but if you want a super hero of a different race...look at the incredibles, the ice dude was black and i loved him he was awesome!! so anyway just pointing out that they are out there you just gotta look for them, oh and this is just my opinion i was bored and thought i would give my two cents lol
Why most superheroes are white? The same reason why most movie chraracters are white... jeeze grow up it's hollywood
It's just like any other movie, most movies don't have minorities and when they DO have they are just stereotypes... I'd rather have no minorities just so they are not stereotyped.... FYI I am a minority and I hate all those stereotypes and specially hate it when they do break it and are not stereotyped but people critique it as if only minorities can play stereotype characters... *boggles my mind*
Getting back to the original purpose of my post, I think this is supposed to be ENTERTAINMENT, I think it might be funny and I will watch it.
Oh by the way, they just played the trailer on TV... it says Four friends... so what? they are all white, OMG shoot them! they are racists! *note sarcastic tone*
First of all, who cares if there white? I don't think the person who cast the movie intentionally pick people who were white.
Second, stop fighting! It's gonna come out and we can all see for ourselves wether it was worth it. U've only seen the preview, so you can't judge it yet.
Third, what is wrong with being invisible? I'd give anything to be that. You could do a whole hell of a lot of damage w/ that. As for the baloon guy, that power would be awesome. You could stop a missile with that.
None of us have seen the movie yet. People can decide for themselves about it. So just reign in those horses, people.
Look the important thing is that Tim alan is getting more crappy roles in crappy movies so he can pay the bills.
Hey the invisible is cool because from what I can tell its even his cloths wich hopefuly means he can turn other things invisible, think if he becomes like a ninja when hes older he would be awsome. The expanding power... meh it could be better and it could be worse what if his power was to talk to fish? all the previews show no water around so that would be the worse (not that talking to fish helps you in the water anyway). Its probably just me but it seems like those two boys have some powers that will be a major aset when there older invisible boy + womens locker room = well you get it. and expanding well uh I dont think I have to say anything other than his first is one lucky lady.
i didn't think it was weak and plus can't the invisible guy move fast? like super speed. and that person's right, why are they always white, uh because it just is. i dont think the writer's gave a s*it about guys being weaker or stronger than girls, that's really pathetic that some as$**** thought that guys needed stronger powers than girls.
I'm only saying this in relation to Zoom because I'm a comic fan and there's nothing wrong with the comics. Most comics feature women with powers that allow them to avoid physical contact, telekenisis, Telekenetic, Energy Powers ect, Rarely would you see a vast amount of strong female characters like She-Hulk. Since this is a "Tim Allen teaches kids about something" movie they give the girls the cool powers such as super strength.
You know what the problem is? They came up with the best superpowers for humourus jokes, "hahahaha she's strong but SHE'S A GIRL! That's so out there!" Imagine the amount of puns that can be associated with Summer lifting then dropping people. The entire concept of kid-super heroes is just to bring in cheap jokes and the occasional "you go girl!" from the crowd. Zoom is what they call a "high concept movie" which means it can be described in a one or several sentances. "Ok, they'res these kids... SUPER kids and Tim Allen is in it, it has the good looking girl / guy for the teen audience AND young super kids!" Those kind of movies are ALL the same. I realize I'm generalizing here but as often is the case when I generalize, I don't care.
Oh yes in theory...IN theory communism works...in theory
You know what the problem is? They came up with the best superpowers for humourus jokes, "hahahaha she's strong but SHE'S A GIRL! That's so out there!" Imagine the amount of puns that can be associated with Summer lifting then dropping people. The entire concept of kid-super heroes is just to bring in cheap jokes and the occasional "you go girl!" from the crowd. Zoom is what they call a "high concept movie" which means it can be described in a one or several sentances. "Ok, they'res these kids... SUPER kids and Tim Allen is in it, it has the good looking girl / guy for the teen audience AND young super kids!" Those kind of movies are ALL the same. I realize I'm generalizing here but as often is the case when I generalize, I don't care.
is anyone here aware that this is supposed to be a comedy?
the reason the little girl has super strength is because of the novelty and humorousness of it.
they take a cute little girly girl, stick her in a pink dress and have her throwing cars and buses around in the movie as a joke, because it;s usually the big muscley guys with super strength.
also in all my life reading comics, the girl always seems to have telekinesis powers it's like some unwritten rule. I don;t think I've ever seen guy super heroes with TK.
finally the boy with the stretchy powers and the ballooning ability is also obviously used for comic effect not to make some sort of sociopolitical statement about girlpower.
They are not siblings, the commercial I just saw said friends, besides Invisolad seems to be hitting on TK girl.
The Green Lantern has TK powers, yeah it's his ring, but the powers are all just TK and TK tricks. Also the Great and Powerful Turtle from the Wildcards books had TK.
Judging from the amount and control that the Inflatible Boy has, he looks to be quite powerful, especially if his mass increases too.