4.8? - Stealth (2005) Discussion

[–] m-slovak79 17 years ago

i aint seen the film... but i was wondering why it was so low... cause it did not look like a good film or anything but im sure theres much worse than this out there.

cause to be a 4.x/10 would mean the film is booooring which even if it's cheesy as hell, as long as it's not booring ill probably give it a 5/10 or so.

-------------------
UPDATE: just seen it on tv... it's not as bad as the rating shows... i give it a 6/10 which is what the "majority" of people rated it. 6/10 is most popular followed by a 5/10 which is next most popular vote if you check the details on the voting.... i would NOT go less than a 5/10 for this movie... it at least entertained me some (beil was nice to lol ;) ). although it's not the best movie by any means and overall it's forgettable... but for a movie for "TV" it's not bad at all.

i cant believe all the 1's people been voting as it's CLEARLY NOT THAT BAD! ... looks like theres over a thousand insane people (the 1's) voting for this movie. lol ... sure it has some crappy CGI and a few bad moments here and there but it's far from being a 1/10 if you ask me.

reply

[–] UVRayz 17 years ago

This film gets a 1 from me, and it's only because Biel is eye candy.

reply

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Gewher 17 years ago

Should shut your big fat mouth. I loved it. 9/10

reply

[–] iluvlinkinpark987 17 years ago

I liked it too. I could give it a 6 or 7 out of 10. It was a popcorn action movie. The acting was okay. It was good for a 2 hour movie. I don't really like Rob Cohen. Pretty good action scenes. 1/10 that's not fair.

"don't care about you"

reply

[–] nicknotused 17 years ago

Giving this film 1/10 is just plain stupid but theres a lot of stupid people around.Mostly on these boards it seems.Gave it a 10 to even things up a bit as us brainy people need to compensate for the abundance of morons.

reply

[–] dreadful_sickness 17 years ago

I gave it a 10 too. It amazes me how people let ratings influence their opinion of the film. Get your own brain morons.

reply

[–] le_buff88 17 years ago

yeah i know screw those retards who are really stupid because they don't share our taste or opinions...gawd

reply

[–] ultrachronic 17 years ago

Giving it a 3... it had good special effects.

Hated the bit when Jessica Biel was giving us a step by step narration of what was happening when she ejected... ugh. We can ****ing see what's happening. Totally unnecessary and annoying.

reply

[–] footyhannah1 17 years ago

I gave it a 6 too, the story wasn't too bad, the acting was okay and anything awful about the film was made up for by the special effects. It was good for a popcorn movie, imo it did what it was supposed to do... entertain me for two hours. I have definitely seen worse films that have got a 4.8, so I think that is too harsh. But I so agree with you with the narration thing... it actually made me laugh it was so bad. Other than that, I still give it a six.

"The best way to keep a guy at least ten feet away? Dry heave. Vomit is the new mace." Veronica

reply

[–] kevinsmithf1master02 17 years ago

Stealth, by the numbers:

Budget: $130 million
Box office: $30 million

Any questions?

reply

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] zhangliubao 17 years ago

it get a 2 from me

reply

[–] Cloverfield_33 14 years ago

I gave it an 7. Nothing special but the effects were good and if you turned your brain off it was kind enjoyable though it got better as the film went on.

Fantastic 'Futurama' Forum!!
www.FuturamaFF.com

reply

[–] TeixNYUnholyDun-D 14 years ago

This movie sucks, it was so predictable typical black guy dies first, I predicted this whole movie in twenty mins, and can somebody explain to me the scene where they kill bystanders come on this movie made no sense.

"A child's mind is were a Revolution begins."

reply