Was Emily abused?


When I was watching this movie, I kept getting uneasy feelings that maybe Emily was being molested or abused by Charlie. Obviously it was the director's plan to make us think Charlie was the neighbor or even the cop, but I felt that the remarks by these men towards Emily being "beautiful" and "pretty" were a little inappropriate, and thus making me question abuse. Obviously when we find out who Charlie is, I really hoped this was not what the director was trying to connote, however sexual abuse by a father really isn't unheard of. I guess it was just a combination of the older male characters (the neighbor and the policeman) and their comments towards Emily, and the way the camera kept showing Emily's vacant look on her face in many scenes, I just kept questioning if this was a subtle hint at sexual abuse.

I've only watched this once, so I could be way off. But it was just an uneasy feeling I had while watching the film.

Did anyone else think this might be the case?

reply

It was a cheap red herring. The director wanted the audience suspect the neighbors, the sheriff and so on.

Yes, it was inappropiate and funny to hear EVERYONE, even women saying "you have a beautiful daughter" with those eyes like they wanted to eat her. But I don't think she was sexually abused by her father. It was just the red herring being overused.

reply

I think she was.
There are several hints in the film that wouldn't be there by accident.
The butterfly destroyed. The dolls abbandoned.
Emily dressing up as an adult for the father's date.
The comments are clearly offensive, and I think we see them thru David's point of view.

reply


No, what you mention were facts, but anything to do with abuse.

Charlie just acted like a friend, according Emily..In the movie there is anything that indicates she was abused.
Emily wearing adult clothes was just to bother David with his date,of the same way David bothered Emily when he acted like " Charlie", it was like a revenge.

The broken butterfly was just something to scare Emily.And about the dolls,they probaly fell down from Emily's hand,because she was scared seeing how her dad acted like other person..


Jimmy Doyle and his orchestra

reply

"fell down"?!!.. Are you kidding me?!
The whole thing is clear as day. Yes she was abused.
Here you can see all the clues:
http://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/hide-and-seek-the-most-blatant- movie-about-monarch-mind-control-ever

reply

I agree, this movie makes the most sense when viewed as a depiction of inter-generational sexual abuse and monarch programming. That Vigilant Citizen article makes some pretty compelling points.

It takes a lot of reading and research to be able to accept the notion, though, so I'm surprised to see it on the IMDb boards!

reply

What M_Salama said was correct . This link is a well known site everyone should check out that wants to look behind the curtain of this movie. Cheers

reply

I am not someone who buys everything about the various conspiracy theories out there. But, I think this film had elements of monarch programming. Not saying it happens in real life, but I think in this film it is.

reply

Now that was an enlightening read. Thank you!

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply

meh she wasn't abused

reply

Scary,
I very much see your point, but I don't think it was the filmmaker's intentions.

reply

**Spoiler**

Perhaps not physically abused, emotional and mental abuse was certainly a result of interactions with her dad. Dealing with a person who has a split personality in isolation would erode anyone’s psyche very quickly, especially as a child. The confusion and stress, plus the lying imposed on her for it.

Add in post-traumatic stress disorder that would naturally occur from her mother’s death, even worse that it was considered a suicide. Emily was screwed from the beginning with little chance of surviving. Everything led to a break.

This story is frightening for the subtle portrayal of Emily’s descent.

Emily’s mother potentially had many issues as well, for one cheating on her husband possibly a (subconscious or known) reaction to his long term pattern behavior. David was likely troubled even before the split personality occurred. I suspect that traits like domineering, control freak, obsessive, passive-aggressive, erratic behavior and moodiness were all possible for him.

Leading to my last point that mental illness can be hereditary. With Emily’s struggle beginning at birth.

reply

[deleted]

I found the comments inappropriate at first, too...but then I remember that Emily reminded the neighbor a lot of his dead daughter--that was the basis for the comments.

I didn't think she was abused by Charlie at all. From everything said in the movie, the personality of Charlie was a child. After all, his favorite game was Hide and Seek. He just played with Emily like she was a friend...there wasn't anything sexual about it.

www.myspace.com/pinkcorset

reply

the scan with Emily dressing up as an adult was a big and clear hint.
so I am sure that she was abused by charlie.
yet this is a simple horror movie about schizophrenic mad dad but disgustingly and dramatically there was little sexual secrets about it.

reply

Kids do play dress up in grown ups' clothing, and it doesn't mean they're being raped. Wearing her mother's jewelry and lipstick was Emily's way of keeping her mother's memory alive (and as was mentioned above, annoying her father when Elizabeth was around).

reply

1 . Simple ? Far from it . It was a well thought-out psychological thriller based entirely in real human psychology , no demons , no cheating death , no excessive gore , just flawed , emotionally and mentally scarred human beings , something all too rare in horror films these days .
2 . The " Charlie " persona was basically that of a murderous child and was born of David finding out his wife was cheating on him . With those two details in mind as well as the none-too-subtle implication David himself may have been molested as a child which may have also contributed to his severe psychological issues as an adult , I find it highly unlikely " Charlie " would sink that low ! Murder is one thing but molestation ?
3 . Schizoprenia is , like , hallucinations and hearing voices , you twit ! What David has is Dissassociative Identity Disorder ( formerly Multiple Personality Disorder and still better known by that name in some states ) !

reply

Excellent post, BobFlame.

"Couldn't care less" = "don't care at all"
"Could care less" = "care at least a little"

reply

Thank you kindly , my dear .

reply

Well, don't wanna see a movie through some schizoprenic eyes and be confused.

No suffering, no need for God. Religions fall. Now you know why the Pope ordered the "Holy" crusade.

reply

"Murder is one thing but molestation "

are you kidding? Murder is far worse. Its far worse because murder is permenent. No help groups or therapy or drugs can bring you back from the dead. Its the end if everything you were, are, and couldve been and affected. It is the womens lib agenda to proclaim molestation/rape to be worse than murder. I call BS. Murder gets you the death penalty, molestation doesnt and shouldnt.

reply

are you kidding? Murder is far worse. Its far worse because murder is permenent. No help groups or therapy or drugs can bring you back from the dead. Its the end if everything you were, are, and couldve been and affected. It is the womens lib agenda to proclaim molestation/rape to be worse than murder. I call BS. Murder gets you the death penalty, molestation doesnt and shouldnt.

Actually, I've seen first hand how molestation can affect someone's life. A lot of mental health problems, ongoing trauma, in and out of hospitals. I'm sure there are a lot of survivors out there who feel that the multitude of mental, social and other problems caused by their abuse is a lot harder to continue coping with than if they'd been straight up murdered. Sounds morbid but it's true. The effect of trauma can impact your whole life. Maybe you turn to drugs, maybe you become the abuser, maybe you can't have a stable relationship. Sure, you can't come back from murder. But a lot of people never quite come back from abuse, either.

reply

Maybe - but by the writer, surely - that's Ari Schlossberg.
Will writers ever get credited by critics and filmgoers?

reply