"Is this the best shooter.... ever?"
Certainly not imho. Simply because in the contrary to the
original theme "run,shoot,think" they deliberatly left the
last term out for the second part. For example: no multilevel
puzzles to solve,no exploration needed,stupid NPC-"AI".
While Half-Life 1 felt like one of those ambitioned actionfilms
of the seventies where the player plays the main role,Half-Life
2 feels like a fun-shooter with vehicles in dystopia. And despite
the fact that the first game mostly played in a secret facility
somewhere in the desert the surroundings were far more varied than
in the sequel.
The only advancements of the sequel over the original are technological.
Gameplaywise its considerably dumped down. Still,Half-Life 2 is
better than other sequels of that time,like for example Unreal 2
or Deus Ex: Invisible War,which both practicly wrecked the franchise
for years. HL2 was also massivly hyped by a clever big budget
PR-campaign mostly to establish steam which came piggyback with the
game.
HL2 came out in a time where singleplayer-fps as a creative genre
was in decline because the focus of development was on technical features
rather then gameplay enhancements. And that simply shows also in
HL2. So in retrospect some older games in this genre (and its subgenres)
are simply better gameplaywise while looking freakin old nowadays.
The best comparsion that comes in mind offhandedly is HL1:HL2 like
Fear:Fear2. Well,along that line.
Imho better games from roughly that time are for example XIII,
Alien vs.Predator 2,Far Cry or Tron 2.
reply
share