MovieChat Forums > Captivity (2007) Discussion > Torture Porn?? This was a PG-13 for Sex...

Torture Porn?? This was a PG-13 for Sex!

posted 16 years ago by mwmtampa
8 replies | jump to latest

What a massive disappointment. You read the description of the movie and see a beautiful model is abducted and held captive. You would at least expect full nudity or even toplessness, but no, none of that. How about a bikini or sexy lingerie? Nope, none of that either. Just one foggy image in a mirror for 2 seconds of Elisha Cuthbert's general shape.

Sure there is gore and violence, and enough to justify an R rating. But come on, if you have a beautiful girl in the lead, show something. Or get a girl that will. What a horribly misleading and empty film, given the premise.

[–] frisco_kid_2000 16 years ago

Glad to see I wasn't the only perv who wanted to see that from Elisha in this film. Glad I didn't see it.

If you want to see her boobies I suggest He Was A Quiet Man, and even though its still 4-5 years old, I still think she was at the height of her hotmess in Girl Next Door!

[–] mwmtampa 16 years ago

Thanks for the heads up on He Was a Quiet Man, have not seen that pic yet and will look for that. And agree again on Girl Next Door - Of all the Cuthbert movies I've seen she is indeed hottest in that movie. Of course, unlike Captivity, I had no delusions there would be nudity in that flick.

[–] DrBriefs 16 years ago

The scene in He Was a Quiet Man was, more than likely, a body double.

[–] frisco_kid_2000 16 years ago

I heard that in the directors commentary that it was in fact her boobies that they showed. But who knows??

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] snap-21 16 years ago

no tits ??? and bad movie ... i will pass this one

[–] p0p0p0p 16 years ago

Thanks for the tip. Won't even bother renting this one.

[–] lukejbarnett2002 14 years ago

ha ha!