'trendy, with no point'



This is the summation of what my husband thought of the movie when I had him watch it with me last night. I thought he'd really like it! But after the movie he said he just doesn't like "trendy, little independent" movies like this that have "no point" and have "no beginning, middle, and end."

I got pretty frustrated, because he's not one of those guys who only likes action movies and hates to think. I tried to explain that it was a character study about a family, and that not all movies require a build-up, climax, and resolution, but he just said "pointless."

What argument would you make to defend this movie against someone too stubborn to accept it?

reply

I'd just call him "philistine" and walk away.

reply

The thing about being a 'philistine' it'll sound so darn sophisticated. And to the OP, tell him, "so is life."

reply

Well, I can't call him a philistine since we have a spare room full of classic literature (which he's actually read, unlike Walt) and a wall full of DVDs that includes everything from Citizen Kane to Caddyshack, and I can't respond "so is life" to his "pointless" comment because he'll only respond, "That's something an athiest would say, which I'm not."

Got anything else?

reply

Ok, the point: It's a coming of age story about a young man learning to face the truth of his life -- that his father is far from perfect, that his mother is far from evil, and that life is full of consequences, whether it's feeling regret after rashly dumping a girlfriend of suffering humiliation after being exposed as a plagiarist.

Beginning: Walt sides with his pompous dad.
Middle: Walt begins to see his dad's human failings.
End: Walt rejects his dad's overbearing demands and seeks a more balanced, adult view of his parents. He finally faces the squid and the whale without averting his eyes.

reply

And doesn't want to be told about it via someone else's words. He had to face it himself. He faced his fears. Letting go of his pain.

Nice ending.

reply

Your husband/boyfriend said it himself. He simply doesn't like "independent/quirky" style of movies. It's just a matter of style IMO. Some certain styles turn people off of movies, we've all been there. Judging a book by it's cover basically.

But this is to say that he didn't either notice or it didn't affect him (the tensions within the family.)

reply

LOL, PERFECT!

I would tell your husband that you want him to watch it, because he's in the movie; and have him guess which role.

reply

What argument would you make to defend this movie against someone too stubborn to accept it?
I am afraid your husband read those books like Data from Startrek. If he sees no point in contemplating life then he is not human anymore.

reply

[deleted]

Your husband sounds a lot like me actually. I'm not quite as well read on literature, but I'm a guy who is pretty apathetic about action movies and movies that are perceived as being "guy movies". I generally like movies that are deep exploratory character studies, about which many other guys (and some gals too) will say has no point and "nothing happens in this movie" ... etc.

Still, all that being said, sometimes I do come across a critically acclaimed indie drama that leaves me feeling like the emperor has no clothes on. And when I first saw The Squid and the Whale a couple of years ago, I felt much the same as your husband. But upon re-watching it again recently, I think I was too quick to dismiss it. I still have a couple of criticisms that are not exactly minor, but I recognize I was wrong before and it is in fact a subtly powerful and well done film.

So maybe there’s hope for your husband, though I don’t know if he would be up for giving it a repeated viewing!

One criticism I still have … for me the bleakness and unpleasantness was piled on a bit thick. I really found it jarring to hear quite so much nasty language from the younger of the two boys early in the film, and the parents apparently having little objection to it. And I really don’t think I needed the episode of the boy spreading semen around the school. The essential pain the characters were undergoing due to the break-up of the family was enough. I think the director went for a bit too much shock value. But despite that flaw, the essential gist of the film was very good.

Well, anyway, I don’t know if any of this helps, but just some thoughts to offer.

reply

[deleted]

It can be viewed as an attack on middle-class snobs/quazi-intellectuals.

Somebody here has been drinking and I'm sad to say it ain't me - Allan Francis Doyle

reply

Look, I liked the movie because it was just one of those films you can watch and completely see as a real family. Everyone was flawed and technically no one was moral. I said before in some post that it made it more realistic. Just to restate I really really liked this movie, but I can see what your husband means. while watching the movie I did feel it had way too much of an indie feeling to it. Low budget and the kind of apathetic music. There's nothing wrong with it having an independent film, but if he doesn't like it, he doesn't like it. I know this happened a year ago, but he's your husband. You don't have to win every argument especially about a movie.

reply

I wouldn't try to 'defend' it. We each see what we see.






Born when she kissed me, died when she left me, lived whilst she loved me

reply

I find it interesting that you describe your husband having his own opinion about something as 'stubborness'.

reply