It takes a lot more than population numbers to win a battle and ultimately a war. The seriously outnumbered and barely trained pilots of the Battle of Britain is one example. Location, supplies, weather, timing, morale, the willing cooperation of allies and most of all, appointment of capable individuals to lead, are just a few of the criteria to be considered. Germany ruled by brutal force and blind obedience. Their allies were mostly forced into submission. Some of the most capable people in Europe whose brains and skills could have helped Germany were being disenfranchised and interned in concentration camps; whereas, appointments of command and directorships went to the party loyalists. The factories were run by forced labor. Although they strong and adequately supplied at the beginning, by the end of the war Germany no longer had unlimited supplies of oil, food was scarce, manufacturing was down and they were up against countries which had all of these. Their biggest mistake was to bite off more than they could chew. Occupying Europe by force and keeping order by brutality was not the way to win the willing cooperation of the occupied countries. Time and time again from the time of the Romans we have seen smaller and less well equipped nations defeat large organized armies. The Romans lost in Britain, the USA lost in VietNam. The Soviet Union lost in Afghanistan, and Britain has never really won in Ireland.
reply
share