MovieChat Forums > Inglourious Basterds (2009) Discussion > Probably my least favorite QT movie. It ...

Probably my least favorite QT movie. It lacks substance, it's overlong and outside of Waltz/Fassbender the acting sucks


It's hard to believe QT spent over ten years on this plot. It's like he did make a masterpiece, but stripped the entire thing down to a crowd pleasing Hollywood version with the Bear Jew crap.. the cartoony Hitler scene and so on. Where's the substance? It's even visually boring and we get some of the lamest, most predictable angles on everything. The quality of this movie nosedives on all levels once we get past the intro. Weak ass performance from Brad Pitt, which isn't helped by so many close ups on him during scenes. This truly is the most visually boring Tarantino movie on top of barely anything happening. You can tell someone the whole plot in two paragraphs.

I don't get how so many people view this as a masterpiece over Pulp Fiction, The Hateful Eight or even Django.

Waltz is great, but 2/3 well done scenes alone don't make a great movie. Imagine an average actor in his place and Adam Sandler as the Bear Jew as originally planned.. it would have flopped.

reply

Interesting. It's one of my favourite works of QT - possibly number one for me.

SPOILERS (to anybody who stumbles upon this)

To me, the substance of the show comes with his probing around in the "show" itself. He presents a movie where Brad Pitt and Co. are amusing Nazi-smashers and we root for them and love when they pound skulls. But, later on, we see the German soldier lionized for his efforts. He's a scumwad to us, because he's for the Nazis. But we see a cinema full of Nazis laughing and amused. Should we be so amused?

Hans Landa is one of the evilest bastards (not Basterds) in the movies. But, as depicted here, he winds up defecting and contributing to Team Good Guy. Obviously, he's still awful, and was just doing this to save his hide, but war spins morality around. I was thinking about this and other points of morality throughout the film.

I thought it was gutsy for Tarantino to call into question our notions of good and evil as well as to make us question the theatre of violence. After all, he's one of the biggest participants in violent showmanship.

IB gives me a lot to mull over.

But, what of other substance? I must disagree with your assessment of the acting, but that's very subjective. I will say that Waltz is so frickin' good, though, that even if you didn't like the others, it would still average out to a considerable thespian achievement.

Each scene/chapter in the film builds to a climax and holds my attention with drama that constantly ratchets up until it hums. The opening scene is a masterpiece short film by itself, but the encounter in the basement bar is also a masterclass in building tension. The fact that there are basically a bunch of short films making up this larger work is an impressive stylistic accomplishment - in my opinion.

The movie's vibe, I also love, but again, I know that's subjective.

Finally, I really think Shoshana is a compelling main character. We feel her plight, we see her struggle, and the writing and performance might not be flashy, but I think they have great depth, perhaps because of the lower-key nature that they have.

reply

The film never really worked for me and I could never really put my finger on why. Apart from very little happening throughout the middle part of the film, Waltz's performance really was the only thing that really stood out to me. Pitt's performance was distracting & bordered on parody at times with that terrible accent. It was difficult to take him seriously. I found the Hateful Eight to be way more engaging yet people seemed to sleep on that film by comparison.

reply

I agree with you, didn't work for me completely. That opening scene though has to be in the mix for best tarantino scene. The bar scene was the other part of the film which I enjoyed( but it went on a bit long)

Nothing else really stands out that much aside from waltz for steals the whole film

reply

In my opinion, Eli Roth as the Jew Bear was about as ridiculous as having Channing Tatum in The Hateful Eight.

reply

thank you, kindred spirit

reply

👍👍

reply

first choice was Adam Sandler surely could have done better than Eli Roth

reply

For sure!

reply

i agree its pretty bad

reply

I 100% agree. A lot of fanboys adore this movie for some reason. Brad Pitt tries way too hard to look cool IMO. He played a similar character in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. It’s as if Tarentino specifically directed him to try to look as cool as possible, but it gets on my nerve because it’s so phony.

reply

typical of Trumplican Nazi to say RFK Jr 2024

reply

I agree. QT standard pacing in a WWII/Spy movie just doesn't mix. The QT tropes, style, and pacing works for Pulp Fiction and Once upon a Time in Hollywood, but it just gets annoying here.

reply

It's not a very good movie. Doesn't come close to Jackie Brown or Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

reply