MovieChat Forums > Salem's Lot (2004) Discussion > this movie sucks

this movie sucks

posted 14 years ago by cooljoebay2
6 replies | jump to latest

Wow. Another heap of a remake. When will they ever learn? This movie sucks ass compared to the one and only original. That seems to sum up a lot of movies.

[–] Littleolewine_drinker_me 13 years ago

Both movies suck compared to the book.

Im praying for rain in california so the grapes can grow and they can make more wine.

[–] TheSolarSailor 12 years ago

Both movies suck compared to the book. >>> Yet the old one can STILL be enjoyed for what it is, where this one was just...meh!

- - - - - - -
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?

[–] Mimapopaluck 12 years ago

There's no way I would say the original sucks compared to the book. Inferior yes, but it's a great movie for what it is. The remake is bad on it's own as a movie and in comparison to the book. It doesn't stand up in either category.

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] king_of_bob 13 years ago

This movie sucks ass compared to the one and only original.

You mean the novel?

Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!

[–] captkirk_459 11 years ago

Yeah a mindless Nosferatu is so much scarier than a guy that feels more like Dracula. In my opinion this version is scarier. The Marston House is scarier. The characters have more of a King feel. Barlow is scarier here and so is Striker.