why isn't this movie in the top 250???????
Why isn't this movie in the top 250???
share[deleted]
There are more than 1,300 votes for this film, and score is 8,7.
Still not in top 250....
I wanna see this film to be in top 100 (actually, 8,7 is enough to get into
top 16!)....
I still can't understand the rating/vote judge system of IMDB...
If its reject the vote from none-regular voter, why film like "Star Wars EP3"
is in top 250? Sure most of vote cmae from not movie buff but SW maniacs...
(No offence to SW and SW fans, I love SW EP4 so much when I was kid, but c'mon, EP3 is just so plain, just OK stuff)
Anyway, this film is just masterpeice, nobody is making this sort of film
anymore these days.
Why can people vote more than one time for a single movie? shuoldn't be better that a person was able to vote once to avoid no regulars votes? And how can you know if a vote is regular or not? (sorry for the rude english but i'm italian...)
shareIf you read the bottom of the Top 250 list, it's pointed out how the list system works. The basic thing is that the higher number of votes you have, the higher on the list you get (if you compare two movies with the same basic rating).
You will notice that the rating in the movie page and the rating in the top 250 are not the same (the one in the list is always lower than the basic rating). The one in the list is calculated by using the formula at the bottom of the page.
Now when it comes to "Best of youth" I have compared it to the last movie on the list (today it was "In the heat of the night"). While this movie has a list score of 7.81, "Best of youth" has 7,78. So it's not far from the list. You just have to make people see the movie and give it a good vote.
"Best of youth" now has 1326 votes. if it gets a coulpe of hundred more, it will probably sneek its way onto the list.
So keep yee faith:)
ThaNK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOW I understand!!!!!!!!!!!! How stupid i am!!!!!! (but the instructions were almost hide!!!) HAloa!!!!!!!
share[deleted]
Something tells me that this will be in the Top 250 by the end of the weekend:)
shareAh:)
The pleasure of being correct is always appreciated ;)
Now I HAVE to see this.
[deleted]
it is now fully deserved in the top 250
shareYou're absolutely right.
With a main score of 8.8, this will rise one spot for every 10-20 votes i think.
So just keep on getting people to vote!
This is a very good film, but I think you will all accept that 8.8 rating to be far too high. (Just take a look at the films with a lesser ranking).
“Are we sleep-walking through our waking state or wake-walking through our dreams?”
[deleted]
Never heard of this.
Visit my webpage - Cinephile Empire: http://imperiocinefilo2.blogspot.com/
this topic can be made activz again.
for my part the system is stupid.
the film has almost 2000 votes and 8.6
it should be in the top. i like the site very much but the vote system prefers popular films.
[deleted]
The main problem with the film making it to the 250 is that despite the fact that the film is strong in many ways, the writer and director had a hard time ending it. It is a slow film, but nevertheless, it is a tight and powerful one where everything counts in the first 4 fifths of the film. Then it gets lose, meandering and sappy at the end. Life is filled with problems and there are no simple answers. The only way to avoid them is to retire, opt out, and even then it is an illusion - the film shows this in an epic way until the end when it seems all problems disappear and Italy, with the characters, are going into a problem free future. A much better ending would be showing how the main characters opted out but the younger ones are still at it and life is still an uncertain struggle with questionable goals and results, but the message of love that is there at the end would be carried to the younger generation.
Sorry all you fans, I hate shatter any illusions, because I know how much one can love a film like this - and I know that criticism of something you love can hurt, even if it is valid. I love it too - I've seen it three times (once on the big screen) and I seldom see a film more than once. But after all, it does have its faults.
As for the 250 list being flawed, well the world is flawed (one of the main themes of the film) Sure there is some dead wood in the 250 list, and many of the greats are missing. However, many of the greats are there - more than the dead wood. Realistically, for a foreign film to make it to the actual 250 list it needs popular appeal and it truly has to be one of the top 250 - all the way through not just for four fifths.
did this movie make it to the theaters?
i guess its a mini series not a movie for cinema !!
i think that's a reason why it don't belong to the top 250
[deleted]
It is a regular pattern.
See http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1832382/board/nest/181103050?d=181292754#1 %20%2081292754
See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Movie_Database#Criticisms_of_IMD b_ranking
The content at the above link to the wikipedia entry for "IMDb, section on Criticisms of IMDb ranking" has recently been expurgated of the following link: http://www.deadline.com/tag/imdb-com
share