Ya know, I pondered that fact greatly (after, of course, I finally understood that Zachary was "a part" of him.)
But remember when Dad is teaching (and doing a really horrible explanation on DNA strands)? - - he starts rambling about how genes can be switched on or off, that and viola, he gets the grande idea and figures it out. (as if being a murderous maniac is a genetic "switch" to turn on and off :) - quite handy, I'd say!
Did WE, as viewers, figure this out, even as we managed to get to the end? Barely.. (and as you saw, I had to stop half way to get an explanation)!!
The premise of the film was really interesting - losing a child and purchasing an exact copy. I could go into a realist, scientific view and mention not only genes, but experiences and tiny mutations determine who we turn out to be, so the odds of being identical are ridiculous.. but I won't mention that. :)
But the premise was really interesting. But to add the Zachary subplot - and make it extremely hard to understand and make some sense of - was a really poor choice. This film COULD have been good. Instead it tried to be so mysterious and startling that it really lost all substance.
Or maybe this is just my altered inserted dna with switched on personality quirk genes causing me to really be disappointed by this movie. :)
steph
Cool fact ahead to make up for the previous lack of substance:
(((Just a cool side note, I was watching a documentary on Discovery a few days ago, and they isolated the gene that makes jelly fish "glow" - and they actually managed to insert this genetic material into rats, and these rats fantastically glowed in the dark!!)))
Relating this to the movie, had any of the physical characteristics been implanted, spiffy and understandable.. but somehow I don't think the humane genome will ever be able to insert and switch on and off psycho murderer genes :)
reply
share