I respectfully disagree.
I still find Man On Fire to be an 'entertaining movie', but now watching in my 30s I consider it a well made - but superficial straightforward-kidnap/revenge movie.
Back when I was a teenager I thought this was something much deeper and admired Scott's frantic-paced style and use of color saturation effects of certain sequences. I was in awe of what was back then (for me at least) 'fresh'... now some of those things I admired look extremely dated and feel gimmicky.
A couple of years later Denzel starred in American Gangster which I thought was an extremely boring movie... now that my filmmaking tastes have I guess 'matured' I consider that movie superior to Man On Fire.
Man On Fire 7/10 (when I was younger a solid 9).
American Gangster 8/10 (when I was younger a 6).
reply
share