MovieChat Forums > The Last Samurai (2003) Discussion > Does Tom Cruise get unfairly criticised?

Does Tom Cruise get unfairly criticised?


I am a bit of a samurai film lover, I love the old Japanese films set in this period by the likes of Kurosawa and Kobayshi, and this film really shows a knowledge and respect to those movies and the Japanese culture - which I had been led to believe otherwise before viewing, most likely because of people disliking Tom Cruise. I think the fact he came from making stupid films like Cocktail and that he is a Scientologist leads people to say this. I think his performance in this film was Oscar-worthy, the film itself was magnificent and so underrated, its a shame people are so short-sighted

______________________________
http://www.imdb.com/list/QrvH_XBk74E/ - my top 100 films

reply

...which I had been led to believe otherwise before viewing, most likely because of people disliking Tom Cruise.

Perhaps if it TLS had been made around the time of Cocktail I would have been one of those people. I didn't really like Tom Cruise's movies until 1996, with the one-two punch of Mission:Impossible and Jerry Maguire. But by now it's a given that Cruise will learn whatever is necessary for the role and study the hell out of it, like learning gunplay for Collateral. So I knew going in that TLS would have Cruise doing the swordplay himself rather than having cutaways to a stuntman, which always bugs me.

reply

yes...tom cruise does get unfairly criticized.

reply

Everyone should stop 'dissin' the Cruise and adhire to his enormous acting talents!

reply

Can't stand Tom as a person but absolutely love him as an actor.

Kinda have similar feelings about Russell Crowe, Mel Gibson, and John Travolta.

I go to the movies to see them act, and they all do it well.

But yeah, Tom hurt his acting career and credibility with all his off camera antics, and gets unfairly criticized as an actor as a result.

reply

Yeah, I think he is. He had his odd phase where he was a little obnoxiously public about his beliefs in Scientology, but at the same time it's his right to believe whatever he wants. I don't really care. I think he's a talented actor, and I really took notice of him after seeing Born on the Fourth of July. Daniel Day-Lewis was a very worthy winner that year for Best Actor, but I think I would have given the slight edge to Tom Cruise for the win. He was incredible.

reply

that little phase? You mean him being spokesperson for a bizarre and criminal cult?

I will agree he's not a bad actor although he clearly tries to sell his trademark mug in every shot instead of playing the roll, but I find his activities for scientology so disgusting and off-putting I couldn't care less for any of his movies and fully boycot them.
I did like the last samurai though, I gotta admit that, but I think without him it could have been a lot better.

reply

Definitely. I think a lot of people don't even give this film a chance because it was Cruise. At the time it was made, he wasn't considered the kooky guy he is now, but I think it was still hard for people to consider him a real actor. I thought he did a fantastic job in this film with a multifaceted role like this and more than held his own with Watanabe, who I think is a stellar actor.

reply

he was ok

reply

[deleted]

I think people just have a beef with scientology in particular. It is pretty weird after all.

If you look at the ratings for this film in particular there aren't many '1's which you'd usually see when people have a lot of hate (e.g. mel gibson movies). It makes me think the teasing of cruise is pretty superficial. I'm sure most people realise what a great actor he is.

reply

I like Tom Cruise as an actor. As a person, I do find him a bit weird, but not just because of Scientology.

Welcome to my Nightmare- Freddy Krueger

reply