but dropping Julliard, breaking up with Amy, and running off to Europe?
I've recently rewatched the season, and in the past, while I've been frustrated at Ephram in s3, I think I've come to understand it more. I think dropping Julliard spoke to an action larger than just a "temper tantrum". Yes, he threw something big away, but was this something that *he* had really wanted? I used to think so, but looking back, I think Andy really pushed hard at the Julliard thing in season 3 precisely because he felt guilty. Ephram himself had doubts, and he poignantly voices how he did not want to become his father, and how he didn't want it to be JUST piano for him. Even in the beginning of the season, when he sets off by saying he has to prioritize piano over Amy, he backtracks within a few days and re-arranges his schedule for Amy. Ephram might have been ambitious but a lot of it was really Andy wanting his son to continue in his footsteps, and after the Madison blowout, I can see why the big piano dream was completely tainted for Ephram.
So the moment itself might have seemed like a tantrum, but he was making a conscious choice. I think Gregory Smith [no offense to him, he was young] just wasn't capable of displaying the nuances of that performance, but in the writing, it was all there.
I also understand running to Europe. Without Julliard, his whole life was in disarray. He was graduating from HS, no real future plans, no girlfriend, and a wedge between him and his dad. Why not take a trip and try to self-reflect/gather yourself? It's the perfect time for it. He's young and he had no real commitments at that time.
While I still hate that he broke up with Amy in the way that he did [she was nothing but supportive], I love the convo he had later on when he was trying to mend things. He was a mess at that point and he didn't want to bring Amy down with him. What's wrong with letting her go her own way? It was a selfless act.
A rose is just a rose.
reply
share