Are you the one who killed our friend? BOOM!
I love that part. Never in my wildest did I think that I would cheer for Kevin Costner. Costner let alone playing a complete bad@ss!
shareI love that part. Never in my wildest did I think that I would cheer for Kevin Costner. Costner let alone playing a complete bad@ss!
shareI'm just trying to start a dialogue here, but I sort of thought that exchange was a little cliched. Not Costner's reaction - that part I really like. It was the professional gunman's reaction. That smirk and the cocky voice. It seemed like he was trying to rile Costner's character, but I think it would have been better if he'd been contemptuous, taken his time, spat on the ground, and then answered with out any emotion, cocky or otherwise, in his voice. Because as a young cocky kid, I could see right off the bat that he couldn't keep up with charlie wait. But as a guy who doesn't care to spend any more time talking to a broken down saddle tramp like Charlie Wait than he has to, a guy who doesn't care about that gun at anybody's side, because most epople would hesitate and he wouldn't - well, to me, that seems more menacing. It would also be more of a charlie meeting his past self sort of situation.
But I do agree that Charlie's reaction is awesome.
[deleted]
Okay, but that whole 'Yeah, and I enjoyed it' line, just seems so 'this is my concept of a truely villainous character.'
Lots of the historical killers of men in the old west wasted little time on words. Wild Bill's reply to the boaster that he could kill a bird on the wing, and would do the same to Bill: 'Birds don't shoot back.'
Or in Streets of Laredo, when that old outlaw is bragging about what a vicious killer he is to John Wesley Hardin, and Hardin just smiles, and lets someone else do his bragging.
The thing is, it didn't seem like it would ever be an equal contest between Butler and Wait. Now, I love the idea of two equals facing off and one winning by pure ruthlessness, but it didn't seem like it would even be a contest otherwise.
Did we see the same movie? I thought the response was perfect. He WAS cocky...with all those men standing beside him with guns, why wouldn't he be? As far as he knew Boss and waite were range men. Plus he was trying to impress the boss Denton....Remember the other great line he had at the jail............"oooooooeeeeeee....I think there's gonna be a new sheriff in town...hahahaha" The actor had STYLE...................
share[deleted]
The whole movie turned around for me here, going from a regular old scenery western to a gunslingin', memorable line saying, run through to a great shootout, I was so excited when it was all said and done.
I understand what Johnny is saying. I do not have a problem with that exchange at all, but I can see if it were done Johnny's way it would have been interesting as well. Charley's reaction is perfect and that part could never be changed without damaging the movie.
shareThanks, Randy. It was just a 'what-if' sort of comment, anyway. I still love the movie.
shareI thought the response was perfect.So do I. This is not really worth discussing IMO. share
"ots of the historical killers of men in the old west wasted little time on words."
I bet they didn't sneer and tease as bad as butler though. Perhaps why he wasn't a historical killer and was more a mindless freak with a gun.
That's a great point. After all, he didn't seem to amount to much when he came up against Charlie. All snap and no salt.
shareHe had to be cocky to justify his own killing without making it a difficult moment for the audience. So it was as the rest of the movie: cliche and bland. Seems to be what people take for greatness these days.
sharethat scene was absolutely unexpected! not sure who thought that up, the writer or the director but it was spot on.
You can imagine that happening in real life.
I also liked the part where they are trying to calm Charlie down and he says in a very emotional voice "stand aside"...that gave me the chill bumps because yu rarely get to truly feel what a character is feeling in that moment.
And in that moment I was afraid for what was coming.
I'll ALWAYS root for Costner...that part was AWESOME! Everyone was talking about it. It was great.
shareIt was ridiculous to think he was say that to Costner, knowing it would piss him off, he's only a few feet away, AND has a gun and is ready to shoot him. I think the gunman would have been just a tad more on guard and not so willing to get his brains blown out.
sharelol, you bring a great point. I mean "Hey! I see you have a gun at the ready so I'm gonna say something to piss you off, okay?"
Sharane Alvarez
"If your gonna insult someone, insult them right!"
Actually, thingading, that makes pretty good sense. As John Wayne explained it to James Caan, in the classic EL DORADO, the angrier a gunman gets, the more careless he is in drawing and aiming. Butler's fatal mistake, though, was in assuming that Charlie wasn't as experienced at gunslinging as him.
What I _do_ feel nitpicky about is the number of bullets he used on the third guy he shot. The one standing to his far left. That guy, alone, seemed to get six bullets from the same revolver Charlie used on Butler and Michael Gambon's character!
Was that supposed to be a Walch Navy twelve-shooter? A Lemat nine-shooter (both historically authentic pistols)? Or, just another typical case of Movie Gun Math?
[deleted]
It's widely reported that Costner acknowledged the mistake and said he left it in because he liked the sequence. If that's homage, okay.
Come back, zinc! Come back!
Watched this on Starz with my folks. they had seen it the day before. WHen this part came up, i just remember my dad, who isn't a fan of Costner, jumping and going "Holy Sh!+". Said he must have been taking a bathroom break during that scene the first time. I never laughed so hard before.
As for the scene itself, it was just awesome. Perfect. The set up, the cocky reply, the reaction. All melded great.
lol, that's very funny, wish I could have seen everyone's expression. I would have cried, laughing so hard, lol.
Sharane Alvarez
"If your gonna insult someone, insult them right!"
Absolutely loved that part, and didn't expect it.
It was almost as good as the ending in Unforgiven.
Just seen the film for the first time and thought it was fantastic
The part on this thread was FANTASTIC and made me LOL !!! I honestly thought that bad guy was gonna be there right at the end verses Kevin Costner like in true Hollywood style , but the way he just walked up to him and killed him - before the fight had even started ! - was a masterstroke
Superb Film
--------------------
" No Ace. Just You "
I think this is a great movie. I never heard of it and ended up watching the entire movie, late at night, when we got snowed in here a couple years back.
About this scene, I was thinking they might have been more cautious in dealing with Charlie and Boss. The reason is because they had suprised and disarmed their thugs twice already. Once out on the range and then again, walking right into the jail and tying everyone up.
I was just thinking that, at that point, I might think these two weren't easy pushovers.
But, then again, I chalked it up to being overly confident and arrogant on the part of the killers.
from the comments, its pretty clear it was a dramatically effective move
i seem to recall from somewhere costner saying he did that deliberately to depart, somewhat, for the usual cat-and-mouse betwixt the hero and uber-villain
it also had the benefit of shortening the odds. if 2-3 are going to outgun 7-12, they better be able to surprise people...
my take is that charley was the realDeal trying to find his place back in the world, doing his killing as a scared kid, while the other guy was an entrepreneurial sadistic bully-for-hire, who used his cruel humor probably as much to intimidate, as any prowess with a gun. very different types of human beings.
Yep, this was a truly fantastic moment in one of the best Westerns ever made. My take on it is that Butler wasn't worth squat when it was time for the real deal. The fact that he spouted all that drivel about enjoying the killing and all can, IMHO, be put down to the fact that he wasn't anywhere near as much of a bad ass as he thought he was. As one poster said, real hard nose killers wouldn't waste time with words; but Butler wasn't real in that sense; sure he'd killed people, but it's easy to be the top dog, big bad bully against regular folks. Put Butler up against someone with real sand and this is what happens: "You're the one who killed our friend" BOOM. Bye bye, you're done and gone - chaff in the wind and blown away. And he wasn't as "street smart" as Charlie because he'd never really paid attention to his surroundings. In fact, considering how easily he was dusted, I'd bet he'd never been in a gunfight with a real gunfighter before (otherwise he wouldn't still be walking around) and so he hadn't developed that survival edge/instinct Charlie had and was unable or just not interested in sizing Charlie up in any real way. In his misguided arrogance, his mistake was to write Charlie off as just another cowpoke, i.e., regular folk that he'd had plenty of experience killing. But Charlie was as far from regular folk as Jimmy Olsen is from being Superman, and Butler paid for that mistake with his end.
Watch Bedbug on YouTube at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QI_1YSXt8Y
[deleted]
I have to agree with what that one guy said earlier. It was too movie. I think Bulter would have shot Charley when he gave walking up so aggressively. I think the best way to do that sequence would be to cut the last half of Kim coates line, and just have him go, "that's right." BANG!
Coming Soon... The December Man
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qj7fRpcXRI
3 pages of comments including a blurb from a Costner interview and nobody mentions 1987's "The Untouchables" ? The first thing I thought of/was reminded of when I saw this scene was the Ness/Nitti exchange on top of the Court building in 'The Untouchables'. The dynamics of both scenes are identical.
In 'TU' bad guy/hit man Frank Nitti (Billy *beep* had killed Ness' friend (Sean Connery character) earlier in the movie. When confronted by Ness about it, Nitti cracks wise about watching the Connery character die confident Ness wouldn't harm him. Just as Costner/Charlie immediately shoots Butler in the head in this movie, Costner/Ness throws Nitti off the roof of the building in 'TU'. Costner never said this was homage to the 1987 movie ?? Is it just me ???
LOL !!! The 'bleep' after 'Billy' in my above post is the actors sir name .... but the IMDbs censoring filter wouldn't allow the name to be shown LOL !!!
I could understand if there were no 'r' in the name but this is too much !!
To see the name, go to the 'The Untouchables (1987)' page and see the actors name that played 'Frank Nitti' LOL !!
Or:
Billy 'D' as in dog, 'r' as in Roger, 'a' as in apple, 'g' as in George and 'o' as in orange. Take that censors !!
Yeah, Kim Coates didn't last long in this film
🐺 Boycott movies that involve real animal violence (& their directors) 🐾
I was expecting an old fashioned draw or something... but he just popped the guy standing there lol! Classic.
shareAre you the one who killed our friend? BOOM!
yes a top moment,
start of the only great scene in the movie.
one of the most dramatic ever gunfights.