In order for their plan to work, it was very important that Fitch perceive them as entirely third party, out for money, not pro-gun nor anti-gun types. Being able to swing both ways allowed them to really threaten his case, thus making it worth a great deal of money to bring them on board, thus producing a blackmale against him for 10 years as well as money for their hometown. Also, if they just came to him, it could provoke suspicion, in the "are they out to get us into a scandal?" type of thing.
As far as plot goes, it's an interesting twist-creator, but you can sort of infer their true motives in some subtle ways. Just look at the way she looks at Hoffman's character when presenting a deal, then look at how they speak to Fitch. You can detect a great deal of sympathy in them toward the anti-gun people when you put the pieces together, so I don't think it was really meant to throw the viewers too much.
Plus, from a total story standpoint, the story does everything it can to establish the two as protagonists, the gun lobby as the bad guys (shady room with owners smoking cigars, arson/attempted murder at random intervals, etc), and the Hoffman character as the naive idealist good guy ("I believe in the jury system," surprised that his witness gets messed with, etc).
reply
share