MovieChat Forums > Bowling for Columbine (2002) Discussion > Michael Moore has bigger balls of steel ...

Michael Moore has bigger balls of steel than scum Chuck Heston

posted 9 years ago by wordsatplaytoday
10 replies | jump to latest

Up-Chuck walks away from what are just questions even after he goes to rallies in towns where shooting deaths took place and holds guns up while shouting, "From my cold dead hands!"

And Moore takes on KMart to get them to stop selling ammunition.

So what did Up-Chuck do to change anything at all?
All he did was preach to the choir while rubbing it in the faces of gun violent victims.
Only a coward would do that.

I don't know jacksht about anything. - kinch_telemachus

[–] Metal_Basher 8 years ago

I don't believe Heston ever had balls in the first place. Guns are always a substitute for missing balls, pretty obvious.

HARLEYS R4 YUPPIES
(my bumper sticker)

[–] burrell_dale 8 years ago

I't easy to bash someone when they aren't around to defend themselves-!

[–] burrell_dale 8 years ago

I consider myself a Christian- and because of YOU, I am thinking thoughts I SHOULDN'T be thinking!

[–] Metal_Basher 8 years ago

You're not going to cry are you?
It sounds like violent thoughts are racing in your mind, another reason to strip guns away from maniacs before another tragedy rolls around.

HARLEYS R4 YUPPIES
(my bumper sticker)

[–] Bakezz 8 years ago

Lol what a pathetic loser.

[–] Elephantlips 8 years ago

Yeah, I'm sure there was no editing involved.

F--king gullible r**tard.

[–] WarrenPeace (2267) 2 years ago

I'm guessing the self censored words are:
Far King gullible rest ard.

Which is code for:
You are right, and epic and awesome to make such a post!

Thanx dude.

[–] WarrenPeace (2267) 2 years ago

Nice to see this awesome and epic post filled with truth I did made it's way over here.

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

A steady diet of nothing but carbs will making everything bigger.

[–] Seperatrix (1349) 2 years ago

"And Moore takes on KMart to get them to stop selling ammunition."

I never really understood the place for that moment in the film.

The film was doing a good job of just raising the question as to why this country is so violent (I suppose the subtext is that if we weren't so violent then gun ownership wouldn't be a problem? -- hard to say)

Anyway, about Kmart: What good did it do to get Kmart to stop selling ammunition when it just meant that people could purchase the ammunition somewhere else?

Was it a symbolic gesture to inform activists to get out there and try to make a change and show that it's possible to be successful? Again, hard to say. I just didn't get it.

Moore had earlier in the film gone through a list of the common reasons of what liberals and conservatives point to as an explanation for gun violence, but simultaneously offers a counter example of why all those reasons appear to fail.

The film was getting really interesting at that point. But then . . . Kmart.

Maybe I'm missing something obvious.