unwatchable tripe
I swear. What the *beep*.
shareThe better than average reviews for a horror film and fact that it grossed 30 million on a 1.5 million budget does not support your comment
shareYeah, I mean this is not an award-winning type of movie by any means, but as far as low budget horror movies go it is in the upper echelon.
sharefor the one billionth time....
when people go spend money and watch a movie....
it does not make a movie good...or bad
for the one billionth time....
when people go spend money and watch a movie....
it does not make a movie good...or bad
Excuse me but please reread what I said. I never said the movie was good or bad. The OP said distinctly that it was "unwatchable tripe." The money made by the movie shows that the movie is "watchable" because people watched it. I was only commenting on that it wasn't "unwatchable" and never made any comment about it being good or bad based on the money it made.
It very well may be tripe, but it's obviously watchable tripe.
share
Well then...since we're splitting hairs
The fact that a movie made 30 million dollars at the box office ALSO doesn't mean that it was watchable...ya know, because they make ya pay for the movies in advance...that's kinda how things are done.
I'm not splitting hairs. I made a simple and valid comment that the movie was watchable and you like every other guy on IMDB who dropped out of college and thinks he knows more than everyone else because he's been on IMDB for 12 years, you decided to be a jackass and try to correct my post. It's very obvious you're trying to be a know it all here because you had to revive a one year old thread to make a comment that was asinine and added nothing to the discussion. Then when it's pointed out that YOU didn't understand my post, you pull this 'splitting hairs' bullcrap to try and save face. Just because YOU are too STUPID to know the difference between the words "good" and "watchable" doesn't mean that me clarifying was splitting hairs. It means you didn't understand the post and now you're trying to cover up the stupidity you showed in your original comment by claiming I said something that I didn't. And now you've posted an even stupider response to try to make yourself look less like the idiot that you already do. You failed.
Yeah, making 30 million dollars DOES mean the movie was watchable, moron. It doesn't mean that everyone who watched it enjoyed it, but it DOES mean that people watched it. In order for it not to be watchable, according to YOUR CRITERIA, then every single person who paid to see it would have had to have left the theater and I highly doubt that every single person did that. In fact, I know that they didn't because I saw it twice in the theater in two packed theaters in which the audience remained the entire time.
So how about you shut your stupid mouth before you stick your foot in it again, jerk.