MovieChat Forums > Firefly (2002) Discussion > Motivations: Robin Hood or selfish inter...

Motivations: Robin Hood or selfish interests?


I've read a lot about Firefly and I have a question for those who know this show inside and out:

Do you consider the crew members to be do-gooders, actively interested in righting wrongs?

Or are they really just selfishly motivated, scrambling for whatever they can use to make it through to the next day/adventure?

Or are the characters inconsistently written, vacillating between moral/amoral as it suits the writers' needs? ("We may not be perfect, but we're better than the real bad guys.")

I've thought about this issue recently as I've just heard the show Leverage (which had a similar Robin Hood aesthetic) is being revived with 4 of the 5 main actors returning to their roles.

reply

As I saw it, a crew that just wants to get by, preferably lawfully yet willing to do a bit of smuggling or honorable thievery. But also willing to put their lives on the line to help out those in need. So, neither Robin Hood characters or completely selfish and as written and filmed it seemed pretty consistent to me.

reply

Neither. The crew are all fully fleshed out three-dimensional characters.

reply

Which crew members? I think they have very different motivations and thoughts about what they're doing.

Jayne, for example, is clearly motivated almost entirely by profit. It doesn't mean he doesn't have friends or ever do anything altruistic, but when he does, he kinda surprises even himself.

Book, on the other hand, doesn't condone the crimes and draws from his more spiritual outlook. He does what he does to help people. Sometimes he gets involved (War Stories), but it's clearly not for the cash. He's about prophet, not profit.

Then there are "grey area" characters like (anti)hero Mal. He has to keep his ship in the sky and his people paid/fed, not to mention trying to keep himself from starving, too. There's a pragmatic aspect here where he can't just rob from the rich and give it *all* to the poor. Of course, we also see that he will make a bad business decision to uphold what he considers moral imperatives (The Train Job).

All this is to say that the characters don't have one shared motivation, and often times they have multiple motivations or ideals that they're juggling. As others have said, they're complex characters and aren't as cut-and-dry as most TV land people.

If you want to boil it down, which is doing the writing a disservice, frankly, I'd say that they're mostly thinking of their actions as a "job" like any other - just trying to scrape by and doing what they can to survive. So, more selfish than "Robin Hood". But that's too simplistic for the show's cast of characters and their rich inner lives.

reply

Thanks for your thoughts - I think you really said it well!

reply

Mal is great man... *stab* I mean a good man. *stab* He's alright.

reply

Sometimes he manages to bubble all the way up to big, damn hero.

reply

He's pretty cunning, don't ya' think?

reply

Plus, he can't die because he's too pretty, so God won't let him die.

reply