I disagree with that statement; people go crazy analyzing even the most minute details of a film, some of which are admittedly insignificant. This subject, however, isn't a pointless one. I would've considered there to be a reason for Kiarostami having 10 conversations as I watched the film without any prior knowledge of its creation. It may have been an arbitrary number, simply because there wasn't enough time to do one more or something. I've read that the main actress of the film claimed that the conversations were ones that she had in her own life. Maybe there were only ten of importance. However, it's also a worthwhile topic for discussion and yes, even analysis, AS IT'S THE TITLE OF THE FILM, AND NOT SOMETHING INDICATIVELY BANAL LIKE "DRIVING AROUND TEHRAN"!
Meanwhile, instead of saying "no" or "thou shalt not analyze," how about giving a reason? Like "10 is not an important number in Iranian culture," or "To my knowledge, there is no real significance for having 'Ten' as the title of the film apart from the number of conversations there are in it." See? Not hard. Jeez.
That's all from me.
reply
share