they help reinforce in the minds of the stupid that climate change is a scientific conspiracy
Climate change is not a scientific conspiracy. It's an
UNscientific conspiracy.
Anyone who thinks "climate change" is "scientific" does not grasp what SCIENCE is. And anyone -- anywhere -- who even BREATHES the word "consensus" is either an ignorant fool or a lying charlatan, and perhaps both... Science does not operate by "consensus". Never has, never will. Every single person on the planet can believe one thing, and one solitary person another. If the solitary person performs the right experiment, with the correct results, he/she can demonstrate that he/she is right and everyone else wrong.
If you doubt this, look into the history of "
Lumniferous Ether" (once one of THE prevalent theories of physics that EVERYONE knew was correct) and the
Michelson-Morley Experiment. "Consensus" debunked by two men.
Science is about experiment, reproduction of experiments, and predictions based on theories and conducting experiments to
test those theories.
Richard Feynman on
The Scientific Method. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdMmbaQHIs0Pay
particular attention to the part where he is talking @ 5:10, about
vague theories. This phrase describes Global Warming/"Climate Change" in a nutshell.
"
Global Warming" (the fact that you need to change the basic TERM to refer to it says how badly its predictive qualities are) continually twists, alters, and cherry-picks data, hides experimental procedures to prevent the reproduction of experiments, and uses social tricks to attempt to "refute" debate over its validity -- like "Change Denier" (suggesting a false equivalence with "Holocaust Denier") and claiming "consensus" (already debunked above).
Supporters constantly attempt to silence critics, who continually produce challenging evidence to dispute the claims made by its supporters, rather than counter the evidence provided -- mainly, because it usually cannot.
They also attempt to suggest that anyone opposing it is a fraud in the pay of rich monied opposition, all the while ignoring -- utterly -- that the REAL money is to be found in SUPPORTING "Climate Change", not in opposing it. There may be millions to be had in challenging "Climate Change". But there are MANY BILLIONS to be had in supporting it.
P.S., As far as being "stupid", I taught MYSELF Calculus at 15, with no outside help, and was taking -- and passing with A's --
graduate level math courses
before I was 19. I'm also a programmer by trade, so I more than amply understand the limitations of computer modelling techniques, which is what the whole theory is based on.
Is there "Warming"? Probably. The question is not "is there?" -- and this is yet another place where the Climate Change Religionists distort things, by claiming all opposition denies that "change" happens.
Of course it happens. The historiological record is filled with cases where it changes, often quite rapidly.
The questions are not IF it's changing, but HOW, and WHY, and HOW MUCH. And, on top of that, what is the BEST APPROACH to dealing with it,
regardless of cause.
reply
share
scaringi95
8 years ago
I read through the endless paragraphs and the only thing I could surmise is that your full of yourself and for some reason you need to validate your intelligence....... Sorry it's actually one in the same.
reply
share