"But that anti-rape message does lose some of its potency when we realize that the rapist isn't the one being punished in the final sequence."
How does the message lose it's potency if he isn't punished? I don't know how you could lose ANY potency for your anti-rape message with THAT rape scene. In fact, if anything, allowing the attacker to escape brings this thankfully fictional story about rape into even more stark reality INCREASING the lasting power on the viewer.
Tons of rapists get away with it sadly because most victims are too afraid or traumatized to come forward, or worse, aren't believed when they do. In reality, the numbers for both situations are staggering. Why should you, the viewer, be absolved from experiencing the infinite incomplete nature to most of these crimes when the victims can't? Don't they deserve to have their story told regardless of whatever closure the universe denies them?
There's actually a very rich and interesting conversation about sexual politics happening in this film, all of it framed around the giant scope that ranges from intimate love to dehumanizing rape. How society has wired men and women for centuries now to talk about sex, to view and respond to it. For some it's a way to connect, others an escape, or even a weapon - and even THAT can vary from slightly controlling someone with your sexuality to get your way or taking someone's dignity through sexual humiliation - all in direct ignorance of sex's main purpose...to create life.
This film wasn't meant to rally people against rape, but actually force people to take a long, hard, unblinking look at rape (they literally never cut away when it happens) for what it really is, where it really comes from, and how it really happens. It wants us to see what we miss when we look away from something like this, ESPECIALLY when someone gets away with it.
reply
share