MovieChat Forums > Cube 2: Hypercube (2003) Discussion > 8/10 (better than the 1st one). Here's w...

8/10 (better than the 1st one). Here's why:


The acting in CUBE PART 2: HYPERCUBE is still weak, but this time, there's not a single actor to save the movie. Let me rephrase that. There's not a single actor to make the movie better. Script writers Sean Hood, Ernie Barbarash and Lauren McLaughlin also focus more on the survival instincts than existensialism, which once again result in thrilling moments. However, they add math and physics, making this sequel even more of a brain challenge. Showing the outside of the Cube was a bad idea because the mysteries in the 1st movie didn't need to be solved. But you know what? What we see here at the end creates more questions than answers (putting the explanatory alternative ending aside), so it's not really answering anything.


Read more at: http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com/2015/03/comments-round-up-march-2015.html

Any thoughts?

reply

complete bs.

"Read more"

no.

"Any thoughts?"

yeah. buy a domain, switch to wordpress, buy a template and personally i would improve on the content.

reply

Can't tell if this is just a troll review or this is legit. Terrible review either way.

However, they add math and physics, making this sequel even more of a brain challenge.


lulwat?

Koalas are telepathic. Plus, they control the weather.

reply