Anne Naked


Is this the first movie in which Ella enchants us with her boobies?

reply

hahaha! :) Yeah, I think so. It was so weird seeing her in this movie after watching her in Ella Enchanted. Oh, that's still funny.

reply

yeah, i know, right? cuz like i have always known her as always playing some type of princess or like fantasy character..then one day i saw the commercial for when the dvd was coming out..and i noticed it was L.A. and she was laying down with some guy on top of her and it just looked really gritty. I was like whoa..I have to see what this movie is about..then when i was watching it..i was like oh my goodness anne, what r u doing? ur supposed to be ella enchanted...but anne did great in this role..she's very versatile in her acting.

reply

LOL, that was a funny way of putting it. Now I'll have to go watch Ella Enchanted.

reply

well technically yes the first one...
but later she shows them in brokeback mountain


so much for innocent little pricess

reply

its so obvious she doesnt want to be forever typecast as some disney fairytale princess.
thats probably why she took this role. i bet in 10 years, dakota fanning will probably do the same thing.

reply

I think she achieved that, as obvious as it is. Those Princess Diaries checks must have been decent for her to say screw it.

reply

dakota is a better acctress now, than anne. sad.

reply

I think Dakota Fanning has already done a topless scene.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0415856/



One plus two plus two plus one...

reply

[deleted]

speaking of public embarrassment...

reply

Well her co-star Heather Matarazzo may be doing the same thing, she appeared topless in Hostel Part II getting the hell cut out of her.

Homer- Oh I'm sorry son. I didn't realise you, Jay Leno and a monkey were bathing a clown.

reply

[deleted]

yes it is..
this is why it's my favorite!

reply

[deleted]

I would have never seen this movie if it wasn't for Mr. Skin. Bijou and Anne, bravo, bravo. Double P in a movie that isn't a full on porno, I have never been more shocked wathcing a sex scene.

reply

[deleted]

haha, yea, thats how most of yall are sounding. but still its like.."woah." (i didnt mind it tho)

reply

"will you people quit freaking out

who cares if she shows some breast
you all sound like desprate nerds
" Anne Hathaway's naked the worlds gonna explode"

thats what you sound like "

dude we are talking on interweb message boards you know

reply

How did Dakota Fanning do a topless scene?! She's a minor!

reply

Um...Dakota actually has something to flash? Rotflmfao.

reply

How did Dakota Fanning do a topless scene?! She's a minor!


There is no law against child nudity in films. Hundreds of films have child nudity in them. However, i`m quite sure Dakota wore a body suit. So technically, she wasn`t nude in Hounddog.

reply

Actually there are laws in place to protect chidren from nude scenes. Dakota's parents are probably her legal guardians and could sign a consent waiver. Do not be so ignorant as to think that minors are allowed to appear nude or participate in sexually graphic scenes without written concent from legal gaudians. Protect children, not art.

reply

I never said we shouldn`t protect kids but a nude scene harms no one. There`s literally hundreds of films that have child nudity in them.

Besides.... I never said they don`t need parental consent. I just said there is no law against it. And I never said anything about sex scenes! A minor can`t do sex scenes even with parental consent. Although a few films have gotten away with it... its still illegal for a minor to do anything that involves sex but nude scenes are not illegal.

Learn how to read and don`t act like such an idiot!

reply

The first thing that I wrote was that there ARE laws to prevent child nudity in films! Second, I never said that a child could participate in a sex scene. I said a "sexually graphic" scences, i.e. suggested rape and nudity scenes, with parental consent. Someone here needs to read and it's not me.


Title 18 of the United States Code governs child pornography. See Chapter 110, Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children. 18 U.S.C. ยง 2256 defines "Child pornography" as:

"any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where -
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct . . ."

Section 2256 clearly defines images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct as "Child Pornography." It also, however, adds to that definition images that appear to depict a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and images or advertisements that suggest images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

18 U.S.C. ยง 2252 prohibits the production, transportation, or knowing receipt or distribution of any visual depiction "of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." For the purposes of Title 18, 18 U.S.C. ยง 2256 defines a "minor" as any person under the age of eighteen years, and "sexually explicit conduct" as actual or simulated:

"(A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(B) bestiality;
(C) masturbation;
(D) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person"







reply

I said a "sexually graphic" scences


Uhhh... dip sh$t... I mean, dip 21. A minor can`t do any type of sex scene in films. It doesn`t matter whether or not its "graphic". However, the law doesn`t consider kissing as a sex act. Minors can kiss on screen but thats it.

And yet again, there is NO LAW against child nudity. What you posted are the child porn laws, idiot. I think you might be one of these types that THINKS there is no difference between sex and nudity. Please... look up the laws on child nudity in films and photographs, then we can carry on a conversation.

In fact, i`ll tell you what the law says in regards to nudity. If you don`t believe me, look it up yourself.

It says no explicit photos are allowed. In other words, a minor can`t spread their legs and point their privates at the camera but they can stand there totally nude while being filmed and there is no law against that. However, it must hold some artistic value otherwise its considered obscene. Thats all it says. Again, there is no law against child nudity in films and photographs.

reply

Yes, there are stipulations were children can be nude. However, the law states that anything that is beyond the parameters of normal childhood behavior is considered sexually explicit and therefore child pornography. Therefore, the question should be what is normal childhood behavior.

In my personal belief, I think that pointless topless scenes thrown into movies for gratuitous reasons are not normal childhood behavior and therefore should not be included in movies.

Going back to my orginal post, regardless of child nudity or child pornography, Ms. Fanning will still have to have parental consent to participate in the filming of that scence.

On a side note, your use of personal attacks and name calling only serves to show the level of your immaturity and adds nothing to the merit of your aguement.

reply

your use of personal attacks and name calling only serves to show the level of your immaturity


You started it.

However, the law states that anything that is beyond the parameters of normal childhood behavior


No it doesn`t, it plainly states that as long as its not gratuitous or overly explicit, nude scenes are totally legal. End of story...

I think that pointless topless scenes thrown into movies for gratuitous reasons are not normal childhood behavior and therefore should not be included in movies.


Opinions vary. For example... did you know the film CAVEMAN (1981) starring Ringo Starr and Shelley Long has child nudity in it? Ofcourse the theme of the movie is about people that lived in the stone age. So ofcourse not everyone wore clothes back in that day and age. I don`t see anything wrong with a "cavechild" going around topless in that film. Its not meant to arouse sexual impulses nor is it meant to be obscene. But the child nudity scene in Caveman is so subtle that you really don`t even notice it. There are hundreds of films like this.

Should it be illegal for people to own Caveman and be arrested for possesing "child porn"?

I think not....

But like I said before, some films have gotten away with underage sex scenes but no one was ever prosecuted for it. Ever heard of a film called KIDS (1995)? It has several very explicit sex scenes in it involving minors. I`m still wondering how this film made it passed the screening.

reply

You guys are knuckle-heads! Quoting "Law",etc. Give me a break!!! Those laws apply to "exploitation of a minor". And NOT to the making of movies,only to porn. If someone under 18 can have sex at home. Then they can have it on film. That's why porn exist. It's not illegal to film an act of sex. Even if someone is underage. Under age where? I firmly believe that if someone under 18 was willing,and their parents were willing,or,if they were emancipated,it's ultimately not illegal. If it's not exploitive,and a part of the story,then a judge,or idiots can't stop it. People under 18 have been having sex,kids,marriage since time began. If it wasn't wrong then. then it's not wrong now. Stop Being Stupid. P.S. Have you ever seen any foreign/euro movies?
I Kill Kids!

reply

"Minors can kiss on screen but thats it." Well we know that's not accurate because the male juvenile lead put his hands on the female juvenile lead's breasts in Moonrise Kingdom.

The laws are probably complicated. Laws generally are.

reply

YES! definitely in the USA!!! However not the same in the less oppressed counties on the planet where its not so vile or disgusting to see a human form in its natural state. Where it's not oogled upon surly individuals or by those small-minded humans ashamed of their human form. It a no wonder the USA is full of sexually oppressed people just because some faction of its legislating body wills it so. People in the USA grow up being ashame of their own skin. Its really sad.

Don' like wat U see! Don' like wat U heard! Don' like wat happen!
Go elsewhere or Turn movie off

reply

My favorite character-Maggie Murdock in Love and Other Drugs.๐Ÿ˜ˆ
Oh, she's so hot and sexy in it! ๎€’
I can't forget the part where she takes off her clothes in Love and Other Drugs!
That ass? Mmmm!๎€’
๎€‰to her!


But what about Havoc? Thought she seemed frustrated in Havoc. My friend says the scenes are not upto the mark ๐Ÿ˜จ

reply

ROFLMBO!!! I know, right...like i was so used to her being a princess and stuff..and when i was watching this i was like oh no, anne, wut r u doing?!..but this shows that she has good range in her roles.

reply

^^Agreed. She really showed her range in this movie. And she looked pretty damn hot in here as well.

"I am the ultimate badass, you do not wanna `*beep*` wit' me!" Hudson in Aliens.

reply

I don't know what's more ridiculous the topic of this thread or the length of it...

reply

The topless scene in the car seemed kind of gratuitous.

reply

She showed her breasts in Brokeback Mountain. Anyway, I watched this film just because of her, as she was damn smoking.

reply