MovieChat Forums > Gods and Generals (2003) Discussion > Movie Review: The Extended Director’s Cu...

Movie Review: The Extended Director’s Cut of “Gods and Generals”!!!


It is rather long, so I only posted the first three parts. Please click link below to read in its entirety.

------

Once again, I would like to thank Warner Brothers for sending me the two films in advance and allowing for this review to take place. This has really been a lot of fun. I would also like to attach a spoiler warning: if you want to be surprised at what scenes are included when you watch it for the first time, do not read this review until after you see it!

Opening Remarks

When I arrived home from work and found the package had arrived containing the two films I so anxiously awaited to see, I knew my anticipation was going to be soon over. I quickly brought them in the house and opened them up, wanting to watch them right then and there. Instead, I waited a couple of hours, not able to come to the realization of what I was actually holding in my hand. This is the version of Gods and Generals that we have heard so much about, and done our fair share of speculation over. What scenes were coming in? What new characters will there be? Will the Antietam battle scene live up to its reputation spread by the very few who had seen it? Over the next five and a half hours, after taking breaks to jot down notes and walk around, the four hours and forty minutes of brilliance would answer all those questions, and leave me satisfied.

At first, I was not going to take any notes, because I waited so long and wanted to enjoy it, but when the new footage began to flow fast and furiously, I had no choice but to write down what was going on. The first thing that the audience will notice is that the film is broken down into five parts: Manassas, Antietam, Fredericksburg, Moss Neck, and Chancellorsville. This definitely serves to guide the film, and almost makes each section seem like acts from a play, very fitting when you consider the scope of this film and screenplay is Shakespearean in nature. As you will read below, the Antietam scene blew me away, and the newly added John Wilkes Booth character was absolutely fantastic. But what caught my attention was not the addition of new material, but the subtraction of some. Not only are some scenes extended, but some are shortened, and two (that I counted, could have been more) are eliminated all together. Many people said the reason why they found the original boring was because of the constant praying and preaching, and director Ron Maxwell took care of all of that here.

Before the actual review of content, I want to make note of the technical aspects of the Blu Ray presentation. The picture itself was masterfully enhanced and the colors enriched, while the sound is so realistic and absorbing, you will feel like you were picked up and placed right in the middle of the battlefield. Since I already reviewed the theatrical version of this film, this review will focus mostly on the new scenes. Please keep in mind that I could not describe them all, because there were too many, but these were what I felt were the best and most important.

Part One: Bull Run

The first new footage that makes its way in is the highly anticipated insertion of the John Wilkes Booth character, played by Chris Conner, who figures quite prominently throughout the entire film, in five or six scenes. We see him make a speech to some Confederate recruits, citing a line of Shakespeare, but not before signing some autographs for the herds of beautiful young women who flock to see the superstar actor. The portrayal of Booth in this film was so important, because we see what he was really like, before his intense hatred of Lincoln began. He was young, charismatic, and patriotic—most likely the major sex symbol of his day as well. He was not the raving mad lunatic that history tries to paint him as, and here we see the human side of him.

A good scene involving Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, captured by the wonderful Stephen Lang, involves him wanting to purchase a horse. Initially, he intends to give the horse he names “Little Sorrel” to his wife, but keeps him, after telling Pendleton (Jeremy London) that he is “even-tempered”. Several shots are also shown of him riding the horse in the Virginia countryside.

Now we get to a major change involving the original footage. The scene where Jackson prays on the eve of battle was removed entirely, and there is no music playing when his soldiers come out of the woods and on to Henry House Hill. As soon as I saw this, I knew that this cut would be for real. The removal of the prayer kept the pace of the film going more evenly, and allowed for the battle of First Bull Run to be fought with intensity, without the audience having to bring themselves up from listening to Jackson.

Part Two: Antietam

I swear, that when the title card for this part came on the screen, I got goosebumps. For the next hour or so, this would be the section that has the most added footage. John Wilkes Booth makes his second appearance backstage, having a conversation with our good friend Henry T. Harrison, played by Cooper Huckabee, who you will remember as Longstreet’s spy in Gettysburg. We then move to Centreville where Jackson informs his men about his promotion to Major General and transfer to the Shenandoah Valley. His men are upset by this, because the brigade will have to remain, but they say how they will petition to get transferred with him. This makes a coming scene, where he gives his “First Brigade” speech to his men on horseback, have more meaning and clarify a lot. There is also extended dialogue between Jackson and his wife Anna (Kali Rocha) as they are laying in bed, after she visits him.

The Union then makes their entrance, with the already released “Camp Mason” deleted scene. There is a new scene involving Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain (Jeff Daniels) and his superior officer Adelbert Ames (Matt Letscher), whose character was greatly expanded in several scenes, when they discuss tactics and their importance. Ames also remarks that he heard how smart Chamberlain is, and says that he will be able to master whatever duty he is given. Ames also tests Chamberlain’s brother, played by C. Thomas Howell, on the steps in loading a rifle.

Robert E. Lee, played hauntingly well by Robert Duvall, then holds his first council of war, to tell his generals of his Maryland invasion plans. Just like in Gettysburg, Longstreet (Bruce Boxleitner) warns him of the risks, while Jackson is excited for the opportunity.

Now to the part everybody is waiting for, the actual battle scene, and it begins rather unexpectedly. The scene where Chamberlain and Kilrain (Kevin Conway) meet for the first time is expanded, and leads right into the battle, as that meeting was supposed to be on the morning of September 17th. Ames joins Chamberlain and they hear cannon fire in the background. Having never been in battle before, he is nervous, but Ames tells him it is just the artillery feeling each other out—this is really quite unassuming when you consider the bloodshed about to occur. Howell also keeps his humor, when he confronts his brother and says that he has gained weight even with a diet of hardtack and “worms”, as he puts it. The scene then cuts to blasting cannons when all hell breaks loose.

When the battle begins, Lee rides to his artillerymen and tells them how important they are. We then go right into the cornfield, where yes, I will announce it, we have the best battle footage of the entire movie (it even trumps my much loved Fredericksburg). The fighting is fierce and brutal, and the pace of the entire sequence is frantic, making you uneasy because so much is going on. There is no gallantry at Antietam, just horror. The two sides advance and blast away at each other, the bullets shredding the stalks of corn and tearing through arms and legs of the men. There is more blood in these five minutes than the rest of the film, and perhaps that is why it was removed—I’m beginning to think the MPAA was a lot more strict back then, and in 2003 this would have made it an R-rated film. The effects here are top-notch. There is one shot of a bullet going through a man’s canteen and sending water everywhere. The artillery effects are also spectacular, and men go flying when the explosions occur.

Two of the characters I interviewed, Brian Mallon as Hancock and Patrick Gorman as Hood, also get more screen-time here. In just about twenty seconds, Hood will give you the feeling of such realism. Pendleton rides to him and asks how long he can hold, and Hood barely even looks at him and gives a half-hearted salute, because he is too busy watching his Texas infantry get slaughtered in the cornfield. Hancock gets his addition when he confronts the added character of George McClellan (James Parkes) rather unenthusiastically. I will not quote what is said between the two, but McClellan has the air of arrogance about him, and I only wish he got more screen-time, because as a person, he was so complex. There is also a scene revolving Jackson and a close call with a cannonball. However, I will not ruin that for you—you will have to see it for yourself!

Just like in Fredericksburg, Kilrain and Tom have their little wise-crack. The younger of the two says that it would be hard to kill a sergeant (their rank) because there are two men standing in front of them. The old Irishman then says, rather bluntly, “A sergeant only fires his weapon when the men in front of him are killed.” Unfortunately, the two brief scenes in the cornfield is all the fighting we get here. That is the only part of the film that really disappointed me—I guess I was expecting a longer battle scene, but it is my own fault for assuming as much. Nevertheless, the intensity present in just ten minutes or so was so great, that I actually had to watch the scene a second time when it was completed.

When the battle comes to a close, Ames rides and tells the men that they will not be needed. He makes a slight dig at McClellan, for failing to use all his men, and noting how nothing was accomplished by either side, and the losses were so great. It then cuts to Booth, performing on stage, and what he is reciting is played over a pan shot of dead soldiers, with the words matching pretty closely to what is shown. We then see him eating dinner with a lady friend, where he calls Lincoln mad for issuing the Emancipation Proclamation. But it is the lady who steals the scene, when she says the truth about the proclamation, and how it did not really free anyone. Later on, we meet the character of Prussian general Heros Von Borcke (Matt Lindquist), who joins the Confederates and is a friend of J.E.B Stuart (Joseph Fuqua). Here he presents Jackson with a new uniform, a gift from Stuart, and makes him try it on. His character is quite funny, and is in one or two more scenes.

Part Three: Fredericksburg

It was at this point in the viewing, when I looked down at the player and saw there was about two more hours left, that I knew I needed some coffee. Thankfully, I was able to put the notebook down for most of this part, because it was left relatively unchanged. There is one line I like from Pendleton, though, when he tells Lee how far away Jackson is, and how quickly they will arrive. Lee asks something to the effect of, “What are his men made of?” The response is, “It’s General Jackson, sir. For him, dawn begins a minute after midnight.”

While the battle scene was pretty much unedited, there was one thing I did not understand. During the shelling of the city, when the Beales’ and Martha’s family are hiding in the cellar, and there is a knock at the door, the line Martha (Donzaleigh Abernathy) speaks is overdubbed and changed. Rather than, “Praise be, it’s young John.” it goes to, “Praise be, it’s Master John.” Perhaps this was to clarify her place as a slave within the household, though she is treated rather well.

During the scene where the generals meet beforehand, there is about five seconds of dialogue added where Stuart remarks to Jackson that he likes his new uniform. Jackson’s mannerisms make him appear more human, and the added footage really takes him down a notch from where he was, making the emotionless commander a bit more likeable, though that is how he was in real life. There is also a small, yet rousing speech given by James Kemper (the late Royce Applegate) to his men before they are deployed to the stonewall at Marye’s Heights.

My only critique here is that I really expected Maxwell to revamp the CGI effects of soldiers marching into battle. They seem to be enhanced slightly, but the superb clarity of Blu Ray does not hide the fact that they all move exactly the same way. This was scoffed at in the original, and I have no doubt it will be scoffed at by many here too.

Click here to read the whole review:http://gcaggiano.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/movie-review-the-extended-di rectors-cut-of-gods-and-generals/

Sports, movies and history at http://gcaggiano.wordpress.com/

reply

Sounds promising, though I wish Maxwell wouldn't edit out any scenes from the theatrical release while adding others in. I actually like the Book of Esther scene.

reply

Thanks for the commentary. Frankly though, after my rewatch of the film a few weeks back, I'd rather see the deleted scenes than sit through a six-hour cut of the film.

"That's what the elves call Justice of the Unicorn!"

reply

Some scenes were cut? Hmm...I was already going to buy this, but had little hope that Gods and Generals would be any better. It might be now! Does it still seem too rushed through the battle scenes?

reply

Got my copy recently. I thought the battle scenes were still quite rushed. Glad to see Antietam back, but I didn't get any sense of the slaughter it was - too rushed. And they actually got the date wrong, had it found on Sept. 19 instead of 17.

reply

Glad I wasn't the only one who noticed the mistake of the date at Antietam (disappointing for a movie that takes the time to list individual brigades moving to the front at Fredericksburg... the date of the bloodiest day in American history seems a simpler fact to be sure to get right). And I pretty much agree with your assessment of all the battle scenes still being too rushed. But many of the new scenes certainly improved the movie over the original theatrical release -- as others have already said.

With the director's cut divided into the several acts, it certainly backs up the sense I think many of us already had that "Gods and Generals" would have made for a better mini-series than a movie. If "Last Full Measure" ever gets made (doubtful, but I'm hoping), this would probably hold true for it, as well.

reply


HORRIBLE deletion decision!! :L This was vital to understanding Jackson's religious zeal/dependance on the Bible/God! They should have deleted Mira Sorvino's (Fanny Chamberlain) annoying interactions with Jeff Daniels (Joshua Chamberlain)!!

"Now we get to a major change involving the original footage. The scene where Jackson prays on the eve of battle was removed entirely, and there is no music playing when his soldiers come out of the woods and on to Henry House Hill. As soon as I saw this, I knew that this cut would be for real. The removal of the prayer kept the pace of the film going more evenly, and allowed for the battle of First Bull Run to be fought with intensity, without the audience having to bring themselves up from listening to Jackson. "

reply

Hi,
Thanks for your review. I haven't read all of it yet but I just wanted to share some of my own thoughts on both movies (the original release and the EDC).

I have a "love-hate" relationship with Gods & Generals. I love the opening with the flags and the song "Going Home." I love that there are a lot of small details that are based on historic facts. I've read several primary source accounts that verify things that were portrayed in the film. And when I visited the Manassas National Battlefield Park, I was blown away when I saw the VMI jacket (with the fatal bullet hole) of Cadet Charlie Norris, a young man featured in the film. He was the guy who said, "C'mon boys! Quick and we can whip 'em!" Right before he impulsively ran ahead without orders to charge the Union lines.) I did not know the story was true and I was amazed to see the truth revealed to me and not just be reading the story in a book. Indeed, there are a lot of facts and stories I did not know about the Civil War before I saw this film.

But Gods & Generals is a major disappointment as a movie. The film is a celluloid monument to the Lost Cause. It is the spiritual successor to Gone With the Wind and that movie is the spiritual succesor to Birth of a Nation. Anyway, when I saw Gods & Generals in the theatres in 2003, I couldn't define what the Lost Cause was if someone asked me because I was unfamiliar with the term, though I knew the ingredients of it: the war was fought over states' rights. many Black people were faithful servants to their masters. Southerners fought hard but they were beaten by superior numbers. They lost not because they were poor soldiers. They lost because the North beat them with overwhelming resources.

Many of the scenes are bad history, plain and simple. The opening scene with Robert E. Lee and Preston Blair is just wrong from top to bottom. I've written a blog post about this. In the next scene, which takes place April 1861, where the movie introduces Thomas Jonathan Jackson, the caption on the screen says "Major, Thomas Jonathan Jackson, U.S. Army." Another mistake. Jackson had resigned from the US Army in 1851 and never went back. He resigend to become a professor at VMI and the uniform he wears in that scene is the blue uniform of the Virginia State Militia... not the blue uniform of the Federal Army. If you watch the scene, take a look at his belt buckle- it's a Virginia State belt buckle.

And the scene before Fredericksburg where Jackson tells Jim Lewis that some people in the Confederate High command are seriously contemplating enlisting Blacks as soldiers as pure and simple BS. I don't believe this conversation ever took place.

This movie presents a sanitized, Christian Confederacy that reluctantly finds itself thrown into an unwanted war. It shows slavery as such a benign institution, that when Martha Beale and Jim Lewis speak of the desire for freedom, you almost wonder why they would want to leave the wonderful life they apppear to already have. It's nice that it gets details right like someone's uniform or the rifles the 1st Virginia used or whatever... but by misrepresenting the big stories of slavery and what the Confederacy was really about... all of the historic facts it painstakingly got right are sacrificed to Lost Cause nonsense.

I recall hearing that 1500 historians worked on this film. I'm not sure what they did.. but "work" is not the word for it.

The EDC almost makes the original theatrical release a completely different film, in my opinion. I still have issues with it a la Lost Cause and all but it definitely flows better as a movie. It got me wondering if it was supposed to be the intended release of the film and not the version we say in 2003. One of the biggest criticisms (and there are many) of the 2003 version is that it is "poorly edited" and many of the supblots are not developed. But the Director's Cut makes a lot of things make more sense. I'm wondering if it was originally supposed to be the 2003 release and then, for some reason, I don't know why, it was "poorly edited" to be the film as most of us know it.

Biggest disappointment of the Antietam footage is that they captioned the wrong date for the battle- September 19, 1862. That alone speaks volumes about the disappointment of this movie. Besides that, the film did not convey to me the dogfight this battle really was. The Little Round Top scene in Gettysburg was much more intense than this was.

One thing I've noticed in the difference between the two films is the order of some of the scenes is different. In the theatrical release the scenes go like this:

•Introduction of Adelbert Ames/20th Maine (caption reads "Camp Mason, Maine, Spring 1862")
•Jackson salutes his troops ("You are the First Brigade!")
•Hancock and Couch meet with Burnside to argue for sending a light force troops across the Rappahannock, November 1862
But the director's cut flips the order of these scens and offers more information:

•Jackson says farewell (instead of "Godspeed") to his troops (he was reassigned to the Shenandoah Valley) November 1861
•Introduction of Adelbert Ames/20th Maine in August 1862 ( in the summer of 1862, President Lincoln called for 300,00 more volunters- "We Are Coming, Father Abraham, 300,000 More-" and the 20th Maine was one of those regiments which answered the call. The regiment was not formed until August 1862 and the date was deliberately changed for the movie.)
•Battle of Antietam (movie gets the date wrong)
•Hancock and Couch meet with Burnside to argue for sending a light force troops across the Rappahannock, November 1862

BTW, I also noticed the difference in Martha's lines (Young John vs. Master John). not sure why they made that changed. I don't mind that but what bothered me was the change they made to her scene with Hancock. I like the original scene where she quotes scripture and the original music better. In any case (I know she was a real person) I never understood why she claims she wants freedom for herself and her kids and then stays in the Beale House, which doesn't even belong to her, instead of leaving with the Union Army.

reply