Toni Collette


Although she has quite a distinctive face, I am always impressed by the chameleon qualities of Toni Collette. Quite often, she's been in a movie and I didn't realise it was her until I actually read the credits (About a Boy, for example). This film is another example: she morphs into the persona of a 50s housewife with ease, as she did as Austen's Miss Smith in Emma. I know her part was quite small in this but, bearing in mind she was up against some of the female powerhouses of modern cinema, I thought her performance in this was excellent. I reckon she's up there with Blanchett and Kidman as one of Australia's leading actresses, so why doesn't she get more leading roles?

reply

One of the reasons I watched this film is because I knew she was in it, and I completely didn't clock that she was the neighbour until the credits.

She is a fantastic actress. (Not because I didn't recognise her, she is just fantastic.)

reply

I love Toni Collette. She's one of the actresses I'm always watching. I wonder the same thing as you about why she's not in more leading roles.

That was all rather thrilling. Anything more cinematographic could scarcely be imagined.

reply

Judging by your picture & Toni apreciation I assume you've seen Mary and Max.
If not, DO!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0978762/

reply

Yes I have! I thought it was wonderful!



RIP Philip Seymour Hoffman 1967-2014... a tremendously great and talented actor.

reply

I'm not trying to glorify PSH after his death, but he ridiculously smashed it with Max.

reply

Agreed!

He was a great actor. It is just a shame he couldn't conquer his drug abuse issues or he'd still be around today. Very sad.

RIP Philip Seymour Hoffman 1967-2014... a tremendously great and talented actor.

reply

She is great as usual in The Hours, though I'm left wondering what happens with her character. Maybe it's explored more in the book.

Also, I wonder if she used this character as inspiration for her Alice personality in United States of Tara. I find them to be rather similar.

reply

It's just the same in the book as it is in the film: her character is there and gone, not to be seen again. Her scenes exist (in both) to extend the exploration of Laura's character and issues, rather than to establish a subplot. So she's only there long enough to accomplish that.

It's really cool actually to see how different it is, to have a flesh and blood actress of Collette's ability fill out the role that's less layered in the book. Reading, I never wondered again what happened to Kitty; I only saw her thru Laura's eyes, and with Laura I moved onto other things. You just can't blithely move on from Collette's Kitty that way.

reply

I also did not realise the role she played until the end credits.

Its that man again!!

reply

[deleted]