MovieChat Forums > The Hours (2003) Discussion > Great movie but strange cinematography

Great movie but strange cinematography

posted 9 years ago by LetThemEatCake01
5 replies | jump to latest

In the sense that it brings attention to itself. For instance, a movie with interconnected stories were the link is an object somehow feels more natural, more like a movie, but these are a writer, a reader, and the personification of the writer's story, it seems kinda forced? Does that make sense? Or do you feel they are natural parallels? The Laura and Clarissa stories are interconnected but the Virginia Woolf one is not. Although the cinematography is so good it feels seamless.-

[–] spookyrat1 9 years ago

Strange cinematography ... and then ...

so good it feels seamless.

What makes that "strange"?🐭

[–] LetThemEatCake01 9 years ago

That they are three parallel stories not really connected in a way. I don't know how to explain.

[–] spookyrat1 9 years ago

It seems like you may be getting the cinematography muddled up with the narrative.🐭

[–] LetThemEatCake01 9 years ago

I don't know, I mean three stories with no real link between them, being almost entirely parallel, it brings attention to the cinematography, as in it was something that was put together.

[–] ChristianWoolf 8 years ago

That's editing, not cinematography.