Someone Remake this for an American audience!
Or I will. Hahaha. Pretty great concept.
Remake? Why? It's in English, and I don't think the American audience had any problems understanding or enjoying the movie.
It would take a great deal of suspension of disbelief though, as stated in a previous post, comprehensive insurance would cover the loss portrayed in the film without protest or question. Insurance regulators would be down the companies throat, not to mention punitive and treble damages that would have to be paid out if the insurance company acted in bad faith, the way it did in this movie.
A great comedy as it is, why fix something that ain't broke?
I do agree... but I think few Americans have seen an Australian film, unfortunately. I'm saying remake as an American film (similar to Strange Bedfellows) and see what we have to say. I'd be interested.
But you are right.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2683731/
www.myspace.com/markchristmas
No, they should open the market more for foreign films so that they have as much a chance in America as American films have in their lands. It's stupid that they should struggle so hard to get their own films made while the Americans spend three hundred million making *beep* films like Spiderman 3.
shareMy apologies to the Americans
Did the Australians leave off the laugh tape so that the Americans did'nt know when to laugh
One of my pet hates of American comdedy is the incessant laugh tape. Its demeaning to the audience and to the actors. It should be their craft and the interpretation of that craft that causes the laughter - not the finger of a producer.
Walk Quietly throughthis Earth
Leave nothing but Smiles and Pawprints
Can you name ONE movie that has a laugh track? There are films in which a laugh track is incorporated to make a point, but those are integral parts of the film, not a post editing addition.
Can you name ONE movie, American or otherwise that has a laugh track?
If you're referring to network sitcom programming, most of those that are less than 25 years old are filmed in front of live audiences and don't use laugh tracks either.
Happiness is a belt-fed weapon.
They are remaking it... Sixth Sense Productions just optioned the remake rights... Original is good, but could be better... Too much slapstick comedy by Connolly...
shareI would concur that this cannot be remade - just like the Ealing comedies of the 1950s - the humour and charm of the 'smaller' movie simply doesnt translate into a larger Hollywood-esque film.
shareman im getting sick of this, why the hell remake it for americans, is it really that far over their head to enjoy it,i mean come on. And incase you haven't noticed most american remakes aren't even as funny or as good as the movies that preceeded them. why should the rest of the world make room for them just because they can't comprehend it, it is so stupid.
apologies to anyone who may have been offended by this rant.
"sorry, unlike my credit card rating, i hold very little interest"
brad_2007_108 writes:
"just because they can't apprehend it, it is so stupid."
Yeah, I suspect it's really hard to get normal size handcuffs around a film reel.
Happiness is a belt-fed weapon.
Why remake it for a specific audience.
This is a great comedy that is also subtle.
Look what happened to Strange Bedfellows - completely turned into inane slapstick as Chuck and Larry. I have many American films and they don't need their intelligence insulted so that a movie is remade for them to understand. Leva it alone
As someone who's grown weary of pointless remakes, your comment slightly nauseates me.
Sorry -- had to be said.
I thought it was just the money hungry studios remaking everything they can get their hands on, but apparently not. As long as there are a small group of stupid American joes like the OP who keep requesting remakes, Hollywood will keep churning them out, and the general consensus about Americans and their ignorance as perceived by the outside world will continue to grow. The corporations put way too much time in pleasing the moronic minorities
shareOf Course! Remake this for an American audience, genius.
First of all SET IT AMERICA, as we all know Americans are too dumb to cope with such concepts as foreign lands.
Have an ALL AMERICAN CAST, none of those weird foreign accents or quirks, or in-jokes that Americans are too untravelled and un-worldwise to understand.
Then TAKE ALL THE HUMOUR OUR, or at least any humour more sophisticated than you would find in a a Saddler/Stiller/Carell movie. (For a good example of how this is done see; "The Lady Killers", or "Dinner for Schmucks".)
Then have at least ONE POSITIVE BLACK CHARACTER, oh and a gay person, and the females must all be strong emancipated women, who really want nothing more than to settle down and have kids. (yes I know.)
Right take out any signs of intelligence, substitute with cliché, take out drama, add melodrama, take out emotion, substitute with saccharine, sprinkle with a dose of Mom's apple pie and ensure each character is seen to have some redeeming features.
Cast one BIG STAR, have his stupid gurning mug all over the posters, otherwise no American will know if they want to see it or not.
Next pretend this is a WHOLLY ORIGINAL MOVIE. Spend utter $$$ millions on it, esp. on promoting it.
Finally, when the rest of the word calls you totally unoriginal, uncreative, unfunny, morons, pretend not to know what they are talking about.
Hahaha!
shareThis could not be remade with an 'American audience' in mind. It would have to be called "The man who sued an insurance company" because there could not be any jokes or attacks on the existence of god or half the country would boycott it and it wouldn't make any money. 'Cause don't forget in 'murica, no splosions - no dollar, no dollar - no movie.
~It's as if she evaporated... straight through the wullz~
It has now been remade
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2259318/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1